[iot-wg] clarification on BEREC consultation

Jim,

Do you have pointers to additional information regarding all of this?

Eliot

On 17.10.19 15:03, Jim Reid wrote:
> Peter kindly pointed out that my earlier mail today on this topic mistakenly quoted an ETSI thing, not the BEREC consultation. Apologies for any confusion. The morning coffee hadn't kicked in when I sent the email. Well that's my excuse and I'm sticking to it.
>
> The important thing is unchanged though. The Connnect WG is leading the effort on a community response to the BEREC consultation on identification of the network termination point. If members of the IoT WG have input to that community response, please raise them in the Connnect WG. We can of course discuss BEREC's ideas here. However that is unlikely to influence whatever community response emerges from the Connect WG.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> iot-wg mailing list
> iot-wg at ripe.net
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20191017/9912c734/attachment.sig>