[iot-wg] extension of co-chair selection process

A pragmatic way forward? I know it is what we tend to expect from Peter. But why not?

Gordon

> On 25 Apr 2019, at 08:49, Peter Koch <pk at DENIC.DE> wrote:
> 
> Jim, all,
> 
> for one, "expressing support" per thread is voting, not consensus building.
> In that spirit, since the WG is perspectively looking for two new chairs anyway,
> and both canditates do seem qualified to me while at the same time offering different
> perspectives and background, I do not see a need for a continued beauty contest but
> would like to suggest instead to appoint both Sandoche and Peter. That would ease the
> onboarding process, as well.
> When it comes to the staggered terms, we can still have the two draw straws
> (well, an IoT WG should really let them draw batteries instead ...).
> 
> Regards,
>  Peter