[iot-wg] Bad actors
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] Bad actors
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] Bad actors
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Wed Oct 10 14:12:42 CEST 2018
> On 10 Oct 2018, at 13:02, Peter Steinhäuser <ps at embedd.com> wrote: > > I don’t think it’s RIPE’s and this working group’s purpose to get into the name & shame game. In my opinion we should define technical solutions that can be applied to address the security issues introduced by insecure devices. This is a wonderful idea Peter! Consider yourself volunteered! :-) Would you like to help develop this suggestion, for instance by proposing how the WG could define these solutions? Maybe you could put together an outline for a BCP or something like that. It would be great if the WG could produce a RIPE document on this topic.
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] Bad actors
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] Bad actors
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]