[iot-wg] another heave on the co-chair selection procedure
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] another heave on the co-chair selection procedure
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] another heave on the co-chair selection procedure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jelte
ripe at tjeb.nl
Tue Oct 9 17:10:07 CEST 2018
On 10/9/18 4:27 PM, Jim Reid wrote: > It’s uncomfortable to do this when the WG has argely been silent about how the leadership is selected. > the WG (or at the very least the list) has been pretty silent, period. > So could you please indicate your support or opposition to the following? Thanks. > I support this process. > > (1) The IoT WG will have 2 co-chairs who serve staggered 2-year terms. > (2) A co-chair cannot serve more than 3 consecutive terms. > (3) Each year, the longest serving co-chair will stand down and subject to (2) may make themselves available for re-appointment. > (4) The incoming co-chair will be chosen by the WG using consensus and the remaining co-chair will make the consensus determination. > (5) Any circumstances not covered by the above will be resolved by the RIPE Chair whose decision will be final. > Jelte
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] another heave on the co-chair selection procedure
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] another heave on the co-chair selection procedure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]