[iot-wg] Fwd: [ipv6-wg] Invitation to supply feedback on ITU draft Recommendation on IPv6 address planning for IoT
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] Fwd: [ipv6-wg] Invitation to supply feedback on ITU draft Recommendation on IPv6 address planning for IoT
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] Agenda items for RIPE76
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Mon Mar 26 11:47:29 CEST 2018
> On 26 Mar 2018, at 10:32, Michael J. Oghia <mike.oghia at gmail.com> wrote: > > You might want to follow up with Sander about this. *Please* take further (peripheral) discussion of draft Recommendation Y.IPv6RefModel to the IPv6 WG. There’s no reason to drag the IoT WG into that discussion (or cc our list) and quite a few reasons not to do that. BTW Sander’s not one of the IPv6 WG co-chairs. Benedikt, Jen and Raymond are. And while Sander obviously knows a lot about IPv6, there is even more expertise in the IPv6 WG. Note the Reply-to: header on this email.
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] Fwd: [ipv6-wg] Invitation to supply feedback on ITU draft Recommendation on IPv6 address planning for IoT
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] Agenda items for RIPE76
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]