[iot-discussion] the IoT WG charter

• Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] the IoT WG charter

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Niall O'Reilly niall.oreilly at ucd.ie
Fri Sep 29 10:51:23 CEST 2017

On 28 Sep 2017, at 16:22, Jim Reid wrote:

> I think this is much more suitable and support Peter’s text.
   I agree.

> Though we could lose “operational and beyond” from the last bullet 
> point.
   I have no strong feelings either way on this point.

   /Niall

• Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] the IoT WG charter

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ iot-wg Archives ]