[iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gordon Lennox
gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com
Fri May 12 10:25:36 CEST 2017
I agree. A very good starting point. > On 12 May 2017, at 10:22, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote: > > >> On 11 May 2017, at 17:26, Peter Koch <pk at DENIC.DE> wrote: >> >> While there is no shortage on IoT fora/consortia etc, I agree that >> a venue on the topic of "IoT" in the RIPE community is useful >> >> o to discuss challenges and opportunities of "IoT" for >> the RIPE community >> >> o to serve as a focal point for the NCC regarding community >> input to their IoT activities, including liaisons >> >> o to invite IoT communities to for a dialogue on matters >> of operational relevance, including security, the numbering >> system, and applicability of standards >> >> o to develop positions of the RIPE community on IoT matters, >> operational and beyond > > Peter, I think this is very close to what the proposed WG's charter should be. > > > _______________________________________________ > iot-discussion mailing list > iot-discussion at ripe.net > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-discussion
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]