[iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Koch
pk at DENIC.DE
Thu May 11 18:26:04 CEST 2017
Gordon, thanks for your thoughtful response. > I believe we need an IOT WG. While there is no shortage on IoT fora/consortia etc, I agree that a venue on the topic of "IoT" in the RIPE community is useful o to discuss challenges and opportunities of "IoT" for the RIPE community o to serve as a focal point for the NCC regarding community input to their IoT activities, including liaisons o to invite IoT communities to for a dialogue on matters of operational relevance, including security, the numbering system, and applicability of standards o to develop positions of the RIPE community on IoT matters, operational and beyond > And not just an IOT Security WG. Even if the initial emphasis may be on security. Sure, just the item list was to be seen in context of its genesis. -Peter
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]