[iot-wg] some suggestions on "work items" for the WG
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] some suggestions on "work items" for the WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Robert Kisteleki
robert at ripe.net
Fri Dec 1 11:03:18 CET 2017
On 2017-11-30 17:31, Alex Smirnoff wrote: > Ok, I see four basic requirements here: > 1) IoT device should receive regular security updates > 2) security status of the device should be manageable (get patchlevel, > update OTA) for every active device > 3) updates should be digitally signed (unless user is allowed to bypass > this restriction under certain conditions) > 4) the "non IoT" counterpart of the infrastructure, whatever it be, > including development and release process, should be reasonably > protected. > > Did I miss anything? I think it's useful to point to related work in the IETF circles (e.g. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-moore-iot-security-bcp-01) that has a much broader set of requirements with good explanations. Cheers, Robert
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] some suggestions on "work items" for the WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]