[iot-discussion] Proposed US legislation
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proposed US legislation
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proposed US legislation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Patrik Fältström
paf at frobbit.se
Wed Aug 9 07:59:17 CEST 2017
On 8 Aug 2017, at 16:01, Marco Hogewoning wrote: > Still on the fence whether this can only be solved by hard regulation and liability or whether we as industry can still create enough of a cultural shift to “do the right thing” under our own momentum. Require just like in other environmental discussions (glass recycling etc) that the manufacturers present a responsibility/management process for the whole lifecycle of the "thing", and we will be done. Including destruction, recycling of material etc. paf -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 203 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20170809/2b82179b/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proposed US legislation
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proposed US legislation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]