[iot-discussion] Proposed US legislation
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proposed US legislation
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proposed US legislation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gordon Lennox
gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com
Sat Aug 5 21:15:11 CEST 2017
Well it is a piece of legislation rather than policy. ;-) But I like the style. We will have to see though if it is adopted and with what changes. I don’t think though that the Commission could propose similar legislation. Too many differences between how the US works and the EU. EuroPol could be involved I guess if somebody used a vulnerability to commit a crime. Think WannaCry? But Europol would not be there to deal with vulnerabilities. Gordon > On 4 Aug 2017, at 16:03, Michael Oghia <mike.oghia at gmail.com> wrote: > > Based on this points, I think it's a very prudent and reasonable piece of policy. I suppose the relevant institutions within the EU would be the European Commission and perhaps Europol. > > Best, > -Michael -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20170805/807f5672/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proposed US legislation
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proposed US legislation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]