[iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Thu Apr 20 12:01:38 CEST 2017
> On 20 Apr 2017, at 10:53, Marco Hogewoning <marcoh at ripe.net> wrote: > >> >> Minor nit perhaps: "what your access provider can and should be allowed to do about these problems"? >> >> I'm not sure we'd want access providers to have control over what web cams (or whatever) someone wants to install on their home network. > > But you probably would he offended if they do not cut off that spammer or the person that is sending your DNS server a few million queries a second. Indeed. Though that's not the same thing as giving access providers some influence or stake in their CPE customers can install. > They should not have an opinion about connecting a webcam, but what about me hosting a Command & Control server? Nuke it from orbit. Just to be sure. :-) But suppose that webcam is the c&c server. And how would anyone know that?
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]