[iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Eliot Lear
lear at lear.ch
Thu Apr 20 11:46:03 CEST 2017
On 4/20/17 11:03 AM, Jim Reid wrote: > I'm not sure we'd want access providers to have control over what web cams (or whatever) someone wants to install on their home network. > If the SP is facilitating an intelligent decision by consumer, I would suggest there is value. If the SP is making the decision without consumer having the opportunity to decide for him- or herself, that would be quite a different matter. Eliot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 481 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20170420/9e4ba7e7/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]