[iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?

• Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
• Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Eliot Lear lear at ofcourseimright.com
Tue Apr 11 11:39:31 CEST 2017

Hi Victor,


On 4/11/17 11:32 AM, Victor Reijs wrote:
>
> But the road system/provider is not really checking minute by minute
> if someone has MOT! So should the Internet Service provider do that?
>
That would be taking the MOT analogy a bit far, but what if the
operating certificate stated clearly the parameter by which the device
is intended to function?  That could very much be monitored packet by
packet.

Eliot


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 481 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20170411/eba9ba29/attachment.sig>

• Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
• Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ iot-wg Archives ]