[iot-discussion] iot-discussion Digest, Vol 1, Issue 5
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Regulating the IoT (again, re-titled from iot-discussion Digest, Vol 1, Issue 5)
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Pending report from Madrid
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael Oghia
mike.oghia at gmail.com
Thu Nov 24 12:33:37 CET 2016
Great suggestions Corinne! See my comments in an earlier message I sent as well. Best, -Michael On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 6:28 AM, Corinne Cath <corinnecath at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for sharing Gordon, and good question Shane.. I found the article a > bit lacking in terms of a clear reason why regulation is *the* main way > forward. It is not said that if you leave the regulation of IoT in the > hands of several different governments across the world that you get better > security standards all-round. More likely, you will get certain > jurisdictions that do a good job and others that don't. > > I also feel that the call for governments to take this up really opens the > door to legitimizing the ongoing efforts at the ITU to make it the hub for > IoT standard development. And looking at the recent discussions on Over the > Top (OTT) services and DOA at the ITU-D WTSA meeting, I am not sure that is > good solution. > > Rather, it would be great if we could find a way to look at soft law > options and encourage the technical actors responsible for developing > security considerations to take the importance of strong security for IoT > on board, if only because if they don't people will lose trust in them and > their stuff they build. > > And there I see a clear role for RIPE and its members. > > Happy to further discuss! Best, > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:00 AM, <iot-discussion-request at ripe.net> wrote: > >> Send iot-discussion mailing list submissions to >> iot-discussion at ripe.net >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-discussion >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> iot-discussion-request at ripe.net >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> iot-discussion-owner at ripe.net >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of iot-discussion digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: Regulating the IoT (Shane Kerr) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:51:10 +0800 >> From: Shane Kerr <shane at time-travellers.org> >> To: Gordon Lennox <gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com> >> Cc: iot-discussion at ripe.net >> Subject: Re: [iot-discussion] Regulating the IoT >> Message-ID: <20161122125110.47650945 at pallas.home.time-travellers.org> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> Gordon, >> >> At 2016-11-18 14:10:52 +0100 >> Gordon Lennox <gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > You can read Bruce Schneier?s take here: >> > >> > https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/11/03/ >> your-wifi-connected-thermostat-can-take-down-the-whole- >> internet-we-need-new-regulations/ >> > >> > And here: >> > >> > https://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram/archives/2016/1115.html >> >> He's not wrong. But is there a path to reasonable regulation? Can RIPE >> help facilitate this in any way? >> >> Cheers, >> >> -- >> Shane >> -------------- next part -------------- >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >> Name: not available >> Type: application/pgp-signature >> Size: 833 bytes >> Desc: OpenPGP digital signature >> URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/iot-discussion/at >> tachments/20161122/28de5dbb/attachment-0001.sig> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Subject: Digest Footer >> >> _______________________________________________ >> iot-discussion mailing list >> iot-discussion at ripe.net >> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-discussion >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> End of iot-discussion Digest, Vol 1, Issue 5 >> ******************************************** >> > > > > -- > Corinne J.N. Cath > Ph.D. Candidate, Oxford Internet Institute & Alan Turing Institute > > Web: www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people/corinne-cath > Email: ccath at turing.ac.uk & corinnecath at gmail.com > Twitter: @C_Cath > > _______________________________________________ > iot-discussion mailing list > iot-discussion at ripe.net > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-discussion > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20161124/c72cd4b0/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Regulating the IoT (again, re-titled from iot-discussion Digest, Vol 1, Issue 5)
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Pending report from Madrid
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]