[iot-discussion] fwiw iot slide-ware fodder

Thanks for this Rick, I believe this kind of outreach message is or at 
least could become really important if the ITU pushes forward with DONA 
for IoT.

cheers!

-C.

On 15 Dec 2016, at 16:36, Richard Lamb wrote:

> Shane-
>
> Thanks for noticing.
>
> The DNSSEC/IoT security piece is the usual "using DNS+DNSSEC to 
> distribute public keys"/DANE thing to provide some way to bootstrap 
> security in IoT devices (vendors can then go use their own proprietary 
> "lighter weight" mechanisms).  Now I know, having tried writing some 
> validators for ESP8266 etc..., that your low end IoT device doesn't 
> really have a lot of RAM/ROM to deal with RSA DNSSEC validation but I 
> do find many new low-end chipsets to have ECC engines built in.  So 
> there is hope.  But I know you know all that.
> Sorry for pushing DNSSEC but it is kinda my thing here.  Cant blame a 
> guy for doing his job - can you?
>
> -Rick
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Shane Kerr [mailto:shane at time-travellers.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 2:25 AM
>> To: Richard Lamb <richard.lamb at icann.org>
>> Cc: iot-discussion at ripe.net
>> Subject: Re: [iot-discussion] fwiw iot slide-ware fodder
>>
>> Rick,
>>
>> At 2016-12-14 23:52:25 +0000
>> Richard Lamb <richard.lamb at icann.org> wrote:
>>
>>> An animated slide ive been using for iot over the past few years.
>>> https://www.co.tt/files/iotslide.pptx
>>> I am not an artist but if useful, feel free to use. -Rick
>>
>> I like this because there seems to be a persistent desire to invent 
>> some new
>> naming system for IoT. :)
>>
>> To be fair though, DNS and/or DNSSEC does not really address many of 
>> the
>> security problems with IoT. Can you explain a little bit about the 
>> context of
>> this slide?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> --
>> Shane
>
> _______________________________________________
> iot-discussion mailing list
> iot-discussion at ripe.net
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-discussion