From Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie Wed Jan 7 11:52:43 2009 From: Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie (Niall O'Reilly) Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:52:43 +0000 Subject: [enum-wg] RIPE 57 follow-up Message-ID: <1231325563.7186.72.camel@d410-heron> Dear ENUM-WG Colleagues, I'ld like to bring the draft minutes of the ENUM WG session at RIPE 57 to your attention and to ask you read them through and to notify the list of any errors or omissions you find. If no objections are posted to reach the list before 12:00 UTC on Friday, 30 January 2009, I plan to declare the draft minutes 'final' shortly after that date. I'ld also like to bring your attention to the single outstanding action item, and to remind you that the editor of the proposed document needs input from the working group. I feel it will be reasonable in the absence of any contributions of text to declare the action item closed due to insufficient interest during RIPE 58. Best regards, Niall O'Reilly From Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie Wed Jan 7 11:37:42 2009 From: Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie (Niall O'Reilly) Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:37:42 +0000 Subject: [enum-wg] Best Wishes for 2009! Message-ID: <1231324662.7186.57.camel@d410-heron> Dear ENUM-WG colleagues, I wish you all the best for 2009! Best regards Niall O'Reilly Co-Chair, RIPE ENUM Working Group From ihtraum18 at gmail.com Tue Jan 20 20:30:59 2009 From: ihtraum18 at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eduardo_J=FAnior?=) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:30:59 -0300 Subject: [enum-wg] DNS Server Message-ID: Hi, I read which it?s possible implementing a DNS Server which support ENUM with PowerDNS. Is it possible with Bind? I pretend make some tests and I only know Bind so, I felt more free and safe. Any reference? Any version in especific of Bind which support ENUM? []'s -- Eduardo J?nior GNU/Linux user #423272 :wq -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From marco.mouta at gmail.com Tue Jan 20 21:19:27 2009 From: marco.mouta at gmail.com (Marco Mouta) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:19:27 +0000 Subject: [enum-wg] DNS Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <116fd70d0901201219h4d8327a6n2cd47c1e8db95fae@mail.gmail.com> Hi Eduardo, To support ENUM your dns server must suport NAPTR records and Power DNS does it. Please read this presentation: http://ds9a.nl/pdns/pdns-presentation-ora.pdf Some interesting users of PowerDNS: Top-level domains .MN, .MP (and .TK) All Wikipedia sites (Global Load Balancing) Schlund + Partner Tucows E164.org (ENUM) Siemens (ENUM trial) Register.com (visa.com, burgerking.com bayerag.com) Ascio (Speednames) Good Luck. Kind regards, -- Marco Mouta On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Eduardo J?nior wrote: > > Hi, > > > I read which it?s possible implementing a DNS Server which support ENUM with PowerDNS. > Is it possible with Bind? > > I pretend make some tests and I only know Bind so, I felt more free and safe. > Any reference? Any version in especific of Bind which support ENUM? > > > []'s > > -- > Eduardo J?nior > GNU/Linux user #423272 > > :wq From jim at rfc1035.com Tue Jan 20 20:56:18 2009 From: jim at rfc1035.com (Jim Reid) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:56:18 +0000 Subject: [enum-wg] DNS Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Jan 20, 2009, at 19:30, Eduardo J?nior wrote: > I read which it?s possible implementing a DNS Server which support > ENUM with PowerDNS. > Is it possible with Bind? Yes. ENUM is a protocol for mapping E.164 telephone numbers into domain names under e164.arpa. It's does have an impact on the DNS protocol or its implementation. ENUM lookups generally return NAPTR records. These are supported in just about every modern DNS implementation. BIND is the reference DNS implementation so by definition it supports NAPTR records. :-) From richard at shockey.us Tue Jan 20 22:12:09 2009 From: richard at shockey.us (Richard Shockey) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:12:09 -0500 Subject: [enum-wg] DNS Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <015501c97b43$c1f5da70$45e18f50$@us> I'm curious is it in Unbound as well? > -----Original Message----- > From: enum-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:enum-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf > Of Jim Reid > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 2:56 PM > To: Eduardo J?nior > Cc: enum-wg at ripe.net > Subject: Re: [enum-wg] DNS Server > > On Jan 20, 2009, at 19:30, Eduardo J?nior wrote: > > > I read which it?s possible implementing a DNS Server which support > > ENUM with PowerDNS. > > Is it possible with Bind? > > Yes. ENUM is a protocol for mapping E.164 telephone numbers into > domain names under e164.arpa. It's does have an impact on the DNS > protocol or its implementation. ENUM lookups generally return NAPTR > records. These are supported in just about every modern DNS > implementation. BIND is the reference DNS implementation so by > definition it supports NAPTR records. :-) From jim at rfc1035.com Tue Jan 20 22:58:00 2009 From: jim at rfc1035.com (Jim Reid) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:58:00 +0000 Subject: [enum-wg] DNS Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Jan 20, 2009, at 19:56, Jim Reid wrote: > ENUM is a protocol for mapping E.164 telephone numbers into domain > names under e164.arpa. It's does have an impact on the DNS protocol > or its implementation. Whoops! I've not had enough coffee or beer today. That second sentence should of course start "It does not have an impact...". From jaap at NLnetLabs.nl Wed Jan 21 00:00:45 2009 From: jaap at NLnetLabs.nl (Jaap Akkerhuis) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:00:45 +0100 Subject: [enum-wg] DNS Server In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:12:09 -0500. <015501c97b43$c1f5da70$45e18f50$@us> Message-ID: <200901202300.n0KN0jo4043595@bartok.nlnetlabs.nl> I'm curious is it in Unbound as well? If you mean with "it" support for NAPTR, the answer is yes. And before you ask, NAPTR support is in nsd & ldns as well. jaap From richard at shockey.us Wed Jan 21 03:28:45 2009 From: richard at shockey.us (Richard Shockey) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:28:45 -0500 Subject: [enum-wg] DNS Server In-Reply-To: <998ACA62C56A9A43B38520B7AB57ABC801610180@ms-lon-e3mb01.emea.dsmain.com> References: <998ACA62C56A9A43B38520B7AB57ABC801610180@ms-lon-e3mb01.emea.dsmain.com> Message-ID: <01b401c97b6f$fe32d3e0$fa987ba0$@us> Well it should not be too surprising. Though this list is generally oriented toward classic RFC 3761 using e164.arpa though most of us know that that the use of 3761 in private instantiations is doing very well indeed and multiple carriers are looking at various forms of DNS server implementations than can support ENUM. I curious as to what other open source implementations could support 3761 especially in large scale cached environments. Cheers .. The other IETF ENUM WG co-chair ?until the IETF shuts it down. From: Lupton, Ronan [mailto:ronan.lupton at ie.verizonbusiness.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 4:57 PM To: richard at shockey.us; jim at rfc1035.com; ihtraum18 at gmail.com Cc: enum-wg at ripe.net Subject: Re: [enum-wg] DNS Server Oh, activity on this list again, amazing. Just when we thought things were quiet! Ronan ----- Original Message ----- From: enum-wg-admin at ripe.net To: 'Jim Reid' ; 'Eduardo J?nior' Cc: enum-wg at ripe.net Sent: Tue Jan 20 21:12:09 2009 Subject: RE: [enum-wg] DNS Server I'm curious is it in Unbound as well? > -----Original Message----- > From: enum-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:enum-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf > Of Jim Reid > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 2:56 PM > To: Eduardo J?nior > Cc: enum-wg at ripe.net > Subject: Re: [enum-wg] DNS Server > > On Jan 20, 2009, at 19:30, Eduardo J?nior wrote: > > > I read which it?s possible implementing a DNS Server which support > > ENUM with PowerDNS. > > Is it possible with Bind? > > Yes. ENUM is a protocol for mapping E.164 telephone numbers into > domain names under e164.arpa. It's does have an impact on the DNS > protocol or its implementation. ENUM lookups generally return NAPTR > records. These are supported in just about every modern DNS > implementation. BIND is the reference DNS implementation so by > definition it supports NAPTR records. :-) Verizon Ireland Limited ? registered in Ireland ? registered number 224334 ? registered office at Erne Street, Dublin 2, Ireland ? VAT number 8224334A -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Ray.Bellis at nominet.org.uk Wed Jan 21 09:13:36 2009 From: Ray.Bellis at nominet.org.uk (Ray.Bellis at nominet.org.uk) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 08:13:36 +0000 Subject: [enum-wg] DNS Server In-Reply-To: <01b401c97b6f$fe32d3e0$fa987ba0$@us> Message-ID: > I curious as to what other open source implementations could support > 3761 especially in large scale cached environments. To answer your question about Unbound more accurately - yes, of course it supports NAPTR records. However Unbound is a recursive-only server. For authoritative serving its sister product "NSD" can be used. Ray From ronan.lupton at ie.verizonbusiness.com Tue Jan 20 22:57:12 2009 From: ronan.lupton at ie.verizonbusiness.com (Lupton, Ronan) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:57:12 -0000 Subject: [enum-wg] DNS Server Message-ID: <998ACA62C56A9A43B38520B7AB57ABC801610180@ms-lon-e3mb01.emea.dsmain.com> Oh, activity on this list again, amazing. Just when we thought things were quiet! Ronan ----- Original Message ----- From: enum-wg-admin at ripe.net To: 'Jim Reid' ; 'Eduardo J?nior' Cc: enum-wg at ripe.net Sent: Tue Jan 20 21:12:09 2009 Subject: RE: [enum-wg] DNS Server I'm curious is it in Unbound as well? > -----Original Message----- > From: enum-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:enum-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf > Of Jim Reid > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 2:56 PM > To: Eduardo J?nior > Cc: enum-wg at ripe.net > Subject: Re: [enum-wg] DNS Server > > On Jan 20, 2009, at 19:30, Eduardo J?nior wrote: > > > I read which it?s possible implementing a DNS Server which support > > ENUM with PowerDNS. > > Is it possible with Bind? > > Yes. ENUM is a protocol for mapping E.164 telephone numbers into > domain names under e164.arpa. It's does have an impact on the DNS > protocol or its implementation. ENUM lookups generally return NAPTR > records. These are supported in just about every modern DNS > implementation. BIND is the reference DNS implementation so by > definition it supports NAPTR records. :-) Verizon Ireland Limited ? registered in Ireland ? registered number 224334 ? registered office at Erne Street, Dublin 2, Ireland ? VAT number 8224334A -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From michele at blacknight.ie Wed Jan 21 18:46:49 2009 From: michele at blacknight.ie (Michele Neylon :: Blacknight) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:46:49 +0000 Subject: [enum-wg] DNS Server In-Reply-To: <998ACA62C56A9A43B38520B7AB57ABC801610180@ms-lon-e3mb01.emea.dsmain.com> References: <998ACA62C56A9A43B38520B7AB57ABC801610180@ms-lon-e3mb01.emea.dsmain.com> Message-ID: On 20 Jan 2009, at 21:57, Lupton, Ronan wrote: > Oh, activity on this list again, amazing. Just when we thought > things were quiet! > Mailing lists never die ... they just em ... fade away? Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection http://www.blacknight.com/ http://blog.blacknight.com/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 US: 213-233-1612 UK: 0844 484 9361 Locall: 1850 929 929 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Fax. +353 (0) 1 4811 763 ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845