[enum-wg] Name "ripe" in the e164.arpa zone
Patrik Fältström paf at cisco.com
Sun Jan 20 11:39:14 CET 2008
On 17 jan 2008, at 19.50, brett wrote:
>> I wonder what will happen if the ITU one day decides
>> that "ripe.e164.arpa" should be delegated to someone....
>
> Don't think this would cause a problem would it, as this is only a TXT
> record I think it could quite happily co-exist with some NS records.
No, as it in that case should reside in the child zone, and not parent
zone.
That said, I am on the same side as John and others regarding this
issue.
Patrik
[ enum-wg Archives ]