[enum-wg] Session scheduling for RIPE 55 (and future): ENUM vs AP

 From the current draft minutes from RIPE 54:

Y. A.O.B.

Niall explained that there is pressure to provide more space for the  
Address Policy WG, and the suggestion was made that there are some  
WGs whose communities are not be very interested in AP. Are there  
people here who wouldn't mind this session being parallel to AP.
Carsten asked if Niall could send this to the list.
ACTION 54.3: Niall O'Reilly to ask mailing list about having the ENUM  
WG session in parallel with the AP WG session at future RIPE Meetings.



	The meeting plan for RIPE 55 is currently being discussed among the WG

	Chairs and the NCC.  As of the current draft, scheduling ENUM and  
Address

	Policy in parallel seems not to be under consideration, but re- 
arrangement

	to deal with other conflicts is likely and may change this.



	Please speak up, anyone for whom simultaneous scheduling of ENUM and

	Address Policy WG sessions would be a problem.



Best regards,

Niall O'Reilly
Co-Chair, RIPE ENUM Working Group


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/enum-wg/attachments/20070621/87de72f8/attachment.sig>