[enum-wg] Document on good Tier-1 DNS practice

Jim, all -

Jim Reid wrote:
>On Nov 17, 2006, at 15:00, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
>> Of course not.  Although that _is_ what Jim suggested (see above), 
>> I'ld like
>> to believe he was using the phrase as a kind of shorthand, and meant 
>> something
>> different, but related, and IMHO actually useful.
> 
> That's *exactly* what I was suggesting.
> 
>> Another "good DNS practice" document will simply not be worth the effort.
>> The people who might read it know it already;  those who should _need_ to
>> read it won't have their radar pointing in the right direction.
>>
>> A document on "good ENUM Tier-1 practice", if it were available, would be
>> something to which the RIPE NCC could _respectfully_ draw the 
>> attention of
>> new (or not-yet-alerted) Tier-1 operators.
> 
> Indeed. This hypothetical RIPE document might even be thrown over the 
> wall to ITU SG2 as a contribution.

... and this pretty much seems to be in line with what we were talking 
about at RIPE 53 under the agenda item "Quality Task Force". :-)

The action item is on me to gather more input and to report back 
("Ongoing work, progress will be reported at RIPE 54 or also inbetween 
if necessary"); cf. 
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-53/presentations/enu-cs-qtf.pdf .

Best,

	-C.