From kim at centr.org Wed Sep 8 17:47:22 2004 From: kim at centr.org (Kim Davies) Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 17:47:22 +0200 Subject: [enum-wg] Survey on ENUM Projects Message-ID: <413F298A.7050301@centr.org> Dear all, As discussed recently on the list, the chairs have commenced preparing a status page to identify and document the various ENUM projects being conducted in different countries. We would like feedback on the formulation of the questions. At present they are based heavily on those developed by Joakim Str?lmark of the Swedish PTS in a recent survey. If there is additional information that would be useful, or if there is a better formulation for the questions, please provide your input. Most important we would like contributions of information on the various trials being conducted, so we can start populating the table with data. The page is available for the moment at this address: http://www.centr.org/kim/enum/index.html best regards, kim -- Kim Davies, Council of European National Top Level Domain Registries Avenue Louise 327, B-1050 Brussels; Tel. +32 2 627 5550 From Richard.Stastny at oefeg.at Wed Sep 8 20:48:37 2004 From: Richard.Stastny at oefeg.at (Stastny Richard) Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 20:48:37 +0200 Subject: [enum-wg] Survey on ENUM Projects Message-ID: <06CF906FE3998C4E944213062009F162443890@oefeg-s02.oefeg.loc> Hi Kim, just to get the basic information on Austria and VISIONng correct:: Status: trial (since September 2002) Tier 1 Registry:: nic,at Webpage: http://enum.nic.at For Austria in addition: Production: planned November 2004 Tier 1 registry: enum.at Webpage: www.enum.at more detailed answers to the questions will follow regards Richard Stastny Chair Austrian ENUM Platform -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Kim Davies [mailto:kim at centr.org] Gesendet: Mi 08.09.2004 17:47 An: enum-wg at ripe.net Cc: Betreff: [enum-wg] Survey on ENUM Projects Dear all, As discussed recently on the list, the chairs have commenced preparing a status page to identify and document the various ENUM projects being conducted in different countries. We would like feedback on the formulation of the questions. At present they are based heavily on those developed by Joakim Str?lmark of the Swedish PTS in a recent survey. If there is additional information that would be useful, or if there is a better formulation for the questions, please provide your input. Most important we would like contributions of information on the various trials being conducted, so we can start populating the table with data. The page is available for the moment at this address: http://www.centr.org/kim/enum/index.html best regards, kim -- Kim Davies, Council of European National Top Level Domain Registries Avenue Louise 327, B-1050 Brussels; Tel. +32 2 627 5550 From richard at shockey.us Wed Sep 8 21:38:23 2004 From: richard at shockey.us (Richard Shockey) Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 15:38:23 -0400 Subject: [enum-wg] Survey on ENUM Projects In-Reply-To: <413F298A.7050301@centr.org> References: <413F298A.7050301@centr.org> Message-ID: <6.1.0.6.2.20040908150424.0438c610@joy.songbird.com> At 11:47 AM 9/8/2004, Kim Davies wrote: >Dear all, > >As discussed recently on the list, the chairs have commenced preparing a >status page to identify and document the various ENUM projects being >conducted in different countries. > >We would like feedback on the formulation of the questions. At present >they are based heavily on those developed by Joakim Str??lmark of the >Swedish PTS in a recent survey. If there is additional information that >would be useful, or if there is a better formulation for the questions, >please provide your input. > >Most important we would like contributions of information on the various >trials being conducted, so we can start populating the table with data. > >The page is available for the moment at this address: > > http://www.centr.org/kim/enum/index.html well I can help with a few ... As for the the United States .. and in part CC 1 aka the NANP ... DISCLAIMER THESE ARE PERSONAL OPINIONS ETC The United States ENUM forum is located at.. http://www.enum-forum.org/ The Canadian ENUM forum is located at. http://www.enumorg.ca/ To my knowledge no other national ENUM forums are currently operating within the NANP administration area. What is the country and E.164 code? The North American Numbering Plan [aka CC 1] (NANP) is an integrated telephone numbering plan serving 19 North American countries that share its resources. These countries include the United States and its territories, Canada, Bermuda, Anguilla, Antigua & Barbuda, the Bahamas, Barbados, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, Dominica, the Dominican Republic, Grenada, Jamaica, Montserrat, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, Trinidad and Tobago, and Turks & Caicos. NANP numbers are ten-digit numbers consisting of a three-digit Numbering Plan Area (NPA) code, commonly called an area code, followed by a seven-digit local number. The format is usually represented as NPA-NXX-XXXX Who is the delegate for the E.164 code? The status of ENUM within CC 1 is under considerable discussion . The management of 1 NPA resources will be determined on a nation state basis. The status of deployment (notdelegated>applied>delegated/objected>trial>hiatus>production) Not delegated. However it is probable that delegation will occur at the 1 NPA level directly from the ENUM root aka RIPE NCC. ENUM Project contact details (telephone, email, web) Is a trial being, or going to be, conducted? As of 9.2004 there is speculation that trials could be authorized shortly. Is there work or plans toward full permanent deployment? Yes. See national ENUM forums for documentary details. Who is leading the ENUM project? (government, industry working group, etc.) Industry Working Groups in consultation with appropriate National Regulatory Authorities. Who operates the ccTLD for that country at present? .CA is operated by The Canadian Internet Registration Authority (CIRA). A not for profit Canadian corporation that is responsible for operating the dot-ca Internet country code Top Level Domain (ccTLD) for all Canadians in an efficient and professional manner. http://www.cira.ca/ .US is operated by NeuStar under contract to the United States Department of Commerce http://www.neustar.us/ What type of organization runs the ccTLD? (state, private, academic, etc.) See above. NeuStar is a privately held United States Corporation. What is the ccTLD legal regulation, if any? for .CA see http://www.cira.ca/en/cat_Cira.html for .US see http://www.neustar.us/policies/index.html Who is the current Tier 1 registry? TBD To be determined Who is, or will be, the permanent Tier 1 registry? TBD How will the Tier 1 registry selection be made? (i.e. decision, license, concession, agreement, public procurement, etc.) Discussions in the United States and Canada have focused on fair and open competitive bidding process. How will the method of cost recovery for the Tier 1 registry's operations? TBD Will there be more than one Tier 1 provider for the country? TBD Will there be ENUM registrars? TBD What will be the ENUM validation technique? TBD Is there/will there be a special number block for ENUM and/or IP Telephony Currently the North American Numbering plan is a "flat namespace". Thereare no service specific blocks associated with it other than freephone (800-866-877 etc.) Wireless specific overlay codes have been authorized but not implemented. There is no current discussion any form of VoIP specific numbering code. Is there special treatment for unlisted numbers? TBD Are there any plans for infrastructure ENUM? Several companies in the United States are already providing infrastructure ENUM services on a private commercial basis. What is your ENUM WHOIS address? Not Available Please provide the history of ENUM trials, projects etc., if any. What are your future plans? (and dates if available) What is your date estimate on a production ENUM registry launch? IMHO 2005 >best regards, > >kim >-- >Kim Davies, Council of European National Top Level Domain Registries >Avenue Louise 327, B-1050 Brussels; Tel. +32 2 627 5550 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Richard Shockey, Senior Manager, Strategic Technology Initiatives NeuStar Inc. 46000 Center Oak Plaza - Sterling, VA 20166 sip:rshockey(at)iptel.org sip:57141 at fwd.pulver.com ENUM +87810-13313-31331 PSTN Office +1 571.434.5651 PSTN Mobile: +1 703.593.2683, Fax: +1 815.333.1237 or ; <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< From Richard.Stastny at oefeg.at Fri Sep 10 18:14:33 2004 From: Richard.Stastny at oefeg.at (Stastny Richard) Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 18:14:33 +0200 Subject: [enum-wg] Survey on ENUM Projects - Austria +43 Message-ID: <06CF906FE3998C4E944213062009F1624438A3@oefeg-s02.oefeg.loc> Dear Kim and all, First a feedback on the questions: The following 2 questions should be added: 5a. Types of numbers used in the trial? 6a. Types of numbers for production? Response to the question for Austria +43 1. What is the country and E.164 code? CC +43 The Austrian Numbering and Dialing Plan is open and has variable number lenght N(S)N (both area codes and subscriber numbers). See http://www.rtr.at/web.nsf/englisch/Telekommunikation_Nummerierung_Nationale+Nummern_nationaleRufnummern_E129?OpenDocument . It is defined in the RTR's 6th Ordinance of May 12, 2004 which defines regulations for communication parameters, fees and value-added services (KEM-V). The KEM-V (in German can be downloaded from http://www.rtr.at/web.nsf/englisch/Telekommunikation_Telekommunikationsrecht_Verordnungen_Verordnungen_Kommunikationsparameter_KEM-V The KEM-V defines regarding E.164 numbers the following types of numbersin the number ranges: - geographical numbers (+43 1 to +43 7xxx) - numbers for private networks (+43 5xxxx) - mobile numbers (+43 6xx) - location-independant fixed network numbers (+43 720) - numbers for converged services (ENUM enabled) (+43 780) - free-phone numbers (+43 800) - premium rate and value-added services (+43 8xx and 9xx) 2. Who is the delegate for the E.164 code? With the consent of the Austrian Federal Minister for Transport, Innovation and Technology granted on June 7, 2002, RTR is the domain name holder for the national ENUM domain 3.4.e164.arpa in Austria. RTR: Rundfunk und Telekom Regulierungs-GmbH (Austrian Regulatory Authority for Broadcasting and Telecommunications) Mariahilfer Strasse 77-79 A-1060 Vienna, Austria Tel.: +43 (0) 1 58058 - 0, Fax: +43 (0) 1 58058 - 9191 E-Mail: mailto:rtr at rtr.at Web: http://www.rtr.at 3. The status of deployment (notdelegated>applied>delegated/objected>trial>hiatus>production) Current Status: Trial since september 2002 Production planned November 2004 4.ENUM Project contact details (telephone, email, web) Austrian ENUM Trial Platform http://enum.nic.at Chair: Richard Stastny, +43 664 420 4100, richard.stastny at oefeg.at Vice: Michael Haberler, +43 664 421 3465, mah at nic.at Hosted by: OeFEG Arsenal Objekt 24 PO Box 147 A-1103 Vienna, Austria 5. Is a trial being, or going to be, conducted? yes, trial conducted since September 2002 5a. Types of numbers used in the trial? -geographic numbers -numbers for private networks -mobile numbers 6. Is there work or plans toward full permanent deployment? Yes, production planned November 2004 6a. Types of numbers for production? - geographical numbers - numbers for private networks (+43 5xxxx) - mobile numbers (+43 6xx) - location-independant fixed network numbers (+43 720) - numbers for converged services (ENUM enabled) (+43 780) - free-phone numbers (+43 800) for more details see contract between RTR and enum.at (see below) 7. Who is leading the ENUM project? (government, industry working group, etc.) Austrian ENUM (Trial) Platform Industry working group with goverment (RTR) participation 8. Who operates the ccTLD for that country at present? nic.at nic.at Internet Verwaltungs- und Betriebsgesellschaft m. b. H. Jakob-Haringer-Stra?e 8 5020 Salzburg Austria Telefon +43 (662) 4669-0 Fax +43 (662) 4669-29 http://www.nic.at 9. What type of organisation runs the ccTLD? (state, private, academic, etc.) private, but owned by IPA (Internet Privatstiftung Austria/Internet Foundation Austria). See http://www.nic.at/en/company/internetaustria/ia_internetaustria.asp 10.What is the ccTLD legal regulation, if any? See charter of the Austrian Domain Registration http://www.nic.at/en/company/internetaustria/ip_ipaprinzipien.asp 11.Who is the current Tier 1 registry? nic.at 12.Who is, or will be, the permanent Tier 1 registry? enum.at enum.at Dienstleistungs GmbH f?r konvergente Kommunikationsdienste Karlsplatz 1/9 A-1010 Vienna, Austria email: office at enum.at Telefon: +43 (1) 50564 16 - 0 Fax: +43 (1) 50564 16 - 19 web: http://www.enum.at enum.at is also owned by IPA and a sister-company of nic.at 13.How will the Tier 1 registry selection be made? (i.e. decision, license, concession, agreement, public procurement, etc.) decision made Ausgust 2004 by contract between RTR and enum.at until End of 2007 The contract in English can be downloaded from: http://www.rtr.at/web.nsf/englisch/Telekommunikation_Nummerierung_ENUM 14.How will the method of cost recovery for the Tier 1 registry's operations? Monthly fees for Registrars (approx. 0.25 - 0.5 Euro/Month/Domain) 15.Will there be more than one Tier 1 provider for the country? No 16.Will there be ENUM registrars? Yes 17.What will be the ENUM validation technique? Various, also depending on type of number Basic requirements for Registrars and Validation Entities given in the contract between RTR and enum.at 18.Is there/will there be a special number block for ENUM and/or IP Telephony? Yes, - numbers for converged services (ENUM enabled) (+43 780) 19.Is there special treatment for unlisted numbers? No 20.Are there any plans for infrastructure ENUM? 21.What is your ENUM WHOIS address? For the trial: via http://enum.nic.at For production: not yet defined The public WHOIS will only contain the domain, if delegated and the Registrar 22.Please provide the history of ENUM trials, projects etc., if any. 2001-08 First consulation by Austrian regulator (RTR) 2002-02 ENUM Workshop RTR, group of interested partners formed 2002-05 Interim procedures from ITU-T SG2 and TSB Delegation request by RTR to RIPE and ITU-TSB 2002-06 Tier 1 Registry in operation by NIC.AT (the Austrian ccTLD) Delegations for 3.4.e164.arpa from RIPE to nic.at Start of development and deployment 2002-07 First draft of policy framework for MoU of trial by RTR 2002-09 Austrian ENUM Trial Platform established Founding Members: RTR, nic.at, Telekom Austria, OeFEG, Siemens, Kapsch carrierCom, Infonova (BearingPoint) ENUM Tier 2 Nameserver (Telekom Austria) in operation First clients available (ENUM queries on public Internet) 2002-10 Web-Portal for registration and modification in operation SIP and H.323 VoIP applications available First Live Demo in Atlanta, GA (VISIONng/VON/TIPHON) Set-up of Call Center and Registrar (Telekom Austria) 2002-11 ENUM Tier 1 Registry processes fully automated (Nic.at) Test of provisioning processes with selected subscribers Policy Framework and MoU ready -> trial started officially with geographic and mobile numbers 2002-12 Ready to invite real ENUM subscribers and users Live demo of all functions at the ITU-T SG-2 meeting in Geneva 2003-01 ETSI TS 102 172 finalized 2003-02 Conversion to ETSI TS 102 172 compliance 2003-10 First part of trial completed, second phase started (business customers) 2003-11 Decision by RTR to allow numbers for private networks in addition 2003-12 Large Scale ENUM and VoIP Pilot started at the Uni Vienna (AT43) 2004-05 Decision by Austrian ENUM Trial Platform to prepare for production 2004-08 Contract between RTR and enum.at on Tier 1 Registry operation 23.What are your future plans? (and dates if available) Launch Production in November 2004 24.What is your date estimate on a production ENUM registry launch? Nov 2004 Launch of production Jan 2005 Start of Billing for Registrars best regards Richard Stastny Chiar Austrian ENUM Trial Platform From Richard.Stastny at oefeg.at Tue Sep 14 18:38:16 2004 From: Richard.Stastny at oefeg.at (Stastny Richard) Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:38:16 +0200 Subject: [enum-wg] 2nd Plugtests ENUM Workshop 4.-8.October CANCELLED Message-ID: <06CF906FE3998C4E944213062009F1624438AB@oefeg-s02.oefeg.loc> Dear all, the 2nd Plugtests ENUM Workshop scheduled from 4.-8.October at ETSI Sophia Antipolis has been cannecelled due lack of participants. The preparation for the 3rd Workshop and NGN VoIP ENUM Plugtest in 29.Nov-3.Dec in ETSI Sophia Antipolis will take place during the normal ETSI TISPAN#4 WG4 Meetings 13.9-17.9 2004 and TISPAN#4bis 2.-5-Nov 2004. best regards Richard Stastny From paf at cisco.com Tue Sep 21 10:03:31 2004 From: paf at cisco.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Patrik_F=E4ltstr=F6m?=) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:03:31 +0100 Subject: [enum-wg] +46 presentation on Thursday Message-ID: I just got info from Jakob Schlyter that he is happy to talk about the conclusions in Sweden... paf From paf at cisco.com Tue Sep 21 12:53:27 2004 From: paf at cisco.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Patrik_F=E4ltstr=F6m?=) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:53:27 +0100 Subject: [enum-wg] Scribe? Message-ID: <77D2AD57-0BBC-11D9-A869-000A95B2B926@cisco.com> Do we have a volunteer to be scribe at the meeting Thursday afternoon? paf From paf at cisco.com Tue Sep 21 12:58:15 2004 From: paf at cisco.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Patrik_F=E4ltstr=F6m?=) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:58:15 +0100 Subject: [enum-wg] UK Consultation Message-ID: <235199E7-0BBD-11D9-A869-000A95B2B926@cisco.com> We will also get a presentation from DTI in the UK regarding the consultation made. Patrik From james at seng.cc Tue Sep 21 17:24:42 2004 From: james at seng.cc (James Seng) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 23:24:42 +0800 Subject: [enum-wg] IDA Seeks Industry Feedback on Telecoms Policy Regarding Internet Protocol (IP) Telephony and Electronic Numbering Message-ID: <415047BA.1020907@seng.cc> http://www.ida.gov.sg//idaweb/media/infopage.jsp?infopagecategory=&infopageid=I3049&versionid=2 Singapore, 21 September 2004| For Immediate Release As part of its continuing efforts to engage the public in policy development to benefit the infocomm industry, the Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore (IDA) seeks views on the policy framework to facilitate the introduction of Internet Protocol (IP) Telephony and Electronic Numbering (ENUM) in Singapore. The Internet and other IP-based networks are increasingly used by consumers for voice communications (e.g. international voice calls) in combination with, or as an alternative to fixed-line telephony. IP Telephony referred to in IDA's proposed policy framework is a form of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP)1 service that requires traditional local telephone numbers. It allows consumers to make and receive voice, data and video calls using the same telephone number, from any domestic or overseas location with available Internet access. IDA is also seeking public and industry views on ENUM. Through ENUM, consumers use a single electronic number in place of multiple contacts, such as telephone and fax numbers, URLs, and email addresses. ENUM is a protocol that translates a normal telephone number into a format that stores and retrieves Internet addressing information, which in turn, can be used to route communications over the Internet. With increased interest in the provision of IP Telephony services, IDA is seeking views on a suitable policy approach towards IP Telephony and ENUM. Such consultation is in line with IDA's efforts to help ensure that telecoms policies remain relevant, while continuing to sustain and encourage a competitive market environment to the benefit of businesses and consumers. All views and comments should be submitted in writing to IDA by 12 noon (Singapore time) on Friday, 22 October 2004. IDA will consider all submitted inputs before issuing its final policy decision. The public consultation paper can be downloaded from http://www.ida.gov.sg/ , under the sections "Policy & Regulation", "Consultation Papers". From james at seng.cc Tue Sep 21 12:28:50 2004 From: james at seng.cc (James Seng) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 18:28:50 +0800 Subject: [enum-wg] IDA Seeks Industry Feedback on Telecoms Policy Regarding Internet Protocol (IP) Telephony and Electronic Numbering Message-ID: <41500262.4050001@seng.cc> http://www.ida.gov.sg//idaweb/media/infopage.jsp?infopagecategory=&infopageid=I3049&versionid=2 Singapore, 21 September 2004| For Immediate Release As part of its continuing efforts to engage the public in policy development to benefit the infocomm industry, the Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore (IDA) seeks views on the policy framework to facilitate the introduction of Internet Protocol (IP) Telephony and Electronic Numbering (ENUM) in Singapore. The Internet and other IP-based networks are increasingly used by consumers for voice communications (e.g. international voice calls) in combination with, or as an alternative to fixed-line telephony. IP Telephony referred to in IDA's proposed policy framework is a form of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP)1 service that requires traditional local telephone numbers. It allows consumers to make and receive voice, data and video calls using the same telephone number, from any domestic or overseas location with available Internet access. IDA is also seeking public and industry views on ENUM. Through ENUM, consumers use a single electronic number in place of multiple contacts, such as telephone and fax numbers, URLs, and email addresses. ENUM is a protocol that translates a normal telephone number into a format that stores and retrieves Internet addressing information, which in turn, can be used to route communications over the Internet. With increased interest in the provision of IP Telephony services, IDA is seeking views on a suitable policy approach towards IP Telephony and ENUM. Such consultation is in line with IDA's efforts to help ensure that telecoms policies remain relevant, while continuing to sustain and encourage a competitive market environment to the benefit of businesses and consumers. All views and comments should be submitted in writing to IDA by 12 noon (Singapore time) on Friday, 22 October 2004. IDA will consider all submitted inputs before issuing its final policy decision. The public consultation paper can be downloaded from http://www.ida.gov.sg/ , under the sections "Policy & Regulation", "Consultation Papers". From paf at cisco.com Wed Sep 22 12:28:26 2004 From: paf at cisco.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Patrik_F=E4ltstr=F6m?=) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:28:26 +0100 Subject: [enum-wg] Fwd: RIPE 49 Presentation/Tech Prep for Chairs Message-ID: <23AF1A96-0C82-11D9-BF97-000A95B2B926@cisco.com> People that will present things at the ENUM wg meeting, please use this upload facility to upload your presentations. They will appear on the PC in the room if you upload at least the day before the meeting, and at least in the documentation. Please also bring the presentation on USB-stick if you are nervous you uploaded the presentation "too late". paf Begin forwarded message: > From: Nick Hyrka > Date: September 10, 2004 15:36:57 BST > To: wg-chairs at ripe.net > Cc: meeting at ripe.net > Subject: RIPE 49 Presentation/Tech Prep for Chairs > > Dear Working Group Chairs and Co-Chairs, > > > > Here is information on RIPE 49 presentation and technical issues. I've > tried to be as brief as possible and have included several issues in > one mail instead of sending many separate mails. > > Presentation issues > =============== > Chairs and other presenters at the meeting will have the options of: > - using their own laptops to present their material > - using the laptop provided by the RIPE NCC in each conference room > > The Working Group laptops are checked by our OPS staff and offer the > presenter a working environment. This should reduce or eliminate > disruptions to the meeting caused by swapping laptops. > > Another advantage is that the presentations will be available on the > www.ripe.net website.This offers the possibility to look at the > webpages while listening to the webcast. > > Please also know that the KVM switch set-up has been improved. > > There are two ways to upload your presentation: > > - using the new presentation uploading facility > - using the ftp uploading area as before > > Presentation Uploading Facility > ======================= > For RIPE 49, our updated presentation uploading facility will be > available. The upload address is > https://www.ripe.net/cgi-bin/ripemtg/web_upload.pl > > The www web_upload link should be treated as confidential and should > only be used by WG Chairs and presenters. > > The upload form is available from 1 September. > > The upload form asks several questions, and all must be answered. > (i.e., speaker name, e-mail address, subject, description, Working > Group and the file). > > Upon successful uploading, the presenter will receive a notification > by e-mail. Therefore, make > sure your e-mail address is correct! > > The presenter will also see a webpage that the presentation has been > successfully uploaded. Our Webmaster will receive a notification as > well. > > The upload webpage also shows the location of the presentation. > Therefore, it is possible to immediately check the 'location/page' on > the website for your uploaded presentation. > > Presenters can overwrite their presentations by uploading a new one. > > Uploaded PowerPoint presentations will switch to full screen after > opening. > > Within the upload facility we have included some "hints and tips" for > other file formats. > > There will be a syncing mechanism in place in the week of the RIPE 49 > meeting. www.rosie.ripe.net (for attendees only) will have the > presentations online. > > Any NCC technical support person can assist you with uploading your > presentations with a memory stick in case you have problems. > > Uploading Presentations via ftp > ====================== > We will also offer the possibility to upload a presentation by ftp. > > To upload presentations via ftp, just follow these instructions: > > 1.) ftp rosie.ripe.net > This is only possible from within the RIPE Meeting address space > (193.0.8/23) from 19 September. > 2.) Login as ftp > Please provide a valid e-mail address as your password. > 3.) cd wg-name ('ls' to see a list of directories) > All Working Groups, EOF and the Plenary have a separate sub-directory > where presentations may be downloaded. Only these sub-directories are > writable by ftp. > Note that it is not possible to delete or rename presentations once > they are uploaded. Uploaded presentations will be immediately > available on the Working Group laptops for the presenters to access. > 4.) Naming your presentation > Please name your presentation something more descriptive (not, for > example, 'ripe49.ppt' ). Consider using something like > 'attendeename-subject.ppt' (eg. john_doe- whoisdb_tricks.ppt). > > NOTE: If these presentation uploading options fail you, the Operations > Team can provide you with a memory stick along with general support. > > Presentations - style guideline > ====================== > As all sessions will be webcast, here are some suggested guidelines on > presentation preparation to help ensure easy-to-see/understand > information on slides: > > - limit the number of slides to avoid information overload > - use less text and a larger font size so that attendees in the rear > of the room and those viewing webcasts can see the text > - use a standard font, such as Helvetica or Arial, as they are highly > readable > > IRC/Jabber > ======== > IRC (Internet Relay Chat) and Jabber will be provided for use at RIPE > 49. > > As this will be offered on a trial basis, remote attendees who wish to > participate in the meeting will be encouraged to find a proxy who will > present their questions at the meeting. > > Staff from the RIPE NCC will provide monitoring of discussions and > will alert the WG Chair if any questions or statements need to be > recognised. The NCC staff will not provide written responses or > summaries of the discussions. > > Feedback submitted through IRC/Jabber will be archived and made > available on the RIPE NCC website. > > If you do not have an IRC or Jabber client already installed in your > computer, we recommend that you download and register a client when > you arrive at the meeting and before your first session. > > Links to clients and more information on the details of the RIPE 49 > trial feedback mechanisms can be found at: > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-49/feedback.html > > If you have any questions about IRC/Jabber or any other technical > issue, the Operations Team, headed by Cagri Coltekin, will be located > in the Bernini Suite. Cagri and his crew will be happy to help you. > > Webcast & Audiocast > ================ > All sessions will be available via the RIPE webcast and archived. > Sessions in the Medici Room will have both video and audio, whilst all > other sessions will be audio only. > > We encourage you to ask session attendees to always approach the > microphones when they have a question or comment. Please tell them to > state their names and speak clearly. > > ROSIE > ===== > Once again, the RIPE On Site Information Exchange (ROSIE) will be > available providing important meeting information: > http://rosie.ripe.net > > That's all for now. Please do not hesitate to contact Camilla or me if > you have any questions. > > Best regards, > Nick > > From marco.bernardi at neustar.com Tue Sep 28 14:22:25 2004 From: marco.bernardi at neustar.com (Marco bernardi) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:22:25 +0100 Subject: [enum-wg] ENM definition Message-ID: <001a01c4a555$d0deebd0$e7a17ad5@cis.neustar.com> All, at last week's Ripe meeting there was an action point on me to provide ETSI definitions to be considered for inclusion in the ENUM questionnaire. Attached is the ETSI doc. Definitions are in section 3. regards marco -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ts_102051v010101p.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 385728 bytes Desc: not available URL: From andrzejb at nask.pl Wed Sep 29 13:11:13 2004 From: andrzejb at nask.pl (Andrzej Bartosiewicz) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:11:13 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [enum-wg] Survey on ENUM Message-ID: 1. What is the country and E.164 code? PL 48 2. Who is the delegate for the E.164 code? With the consent of the Ministry of Infrastructure, NASK is the domain name holder for 8.4.e164.arpa. 3. The status of deployment TRIAL 4. ENUM Project contact details (telephone, email, web) NASK Andrzej Bartosiewicz, Research and Academic Computer Network 18 Wawozowa Str 02-796 Warsaw www.DNS.pl +48.225231204, andrzejb at nask.pl 5. Is a trial being, or going to be, conducted? Conducted since July 2002. 6. Is there work or plans toward full permanent deployment? Yes. ENUM Registry, protocol (based on EPP), administrative procedures are ready. From technical and administrative point of view Tier-1 registry is already deployed. 7. Who is leading the ENUM project? (government, industry working group, etc.) NASK + Office of Telecommunications and Post Regulation (URTiP, www.URTIP.gov.pl) 8. Who operates the ccTLD for that country at present? NASK Research and Academic Computer Network 18 Wawozowa Str 02-796 Warsaw www.DNS.pl +48.225231204 9. What type of organisation runs the ccTLD? (state, private, academic, etc.) State, R&D status http://www.nask.pl/run/n/Who_we_are 10. What is the ccTLD legal regulation, if any? see: http://www.nask.pl/run/n/Who_we_are 11. Who is the current Tier 1 registry? NASK Research and Academic Computer Network 18 Wawozowa Str 02-796 Warsaw www.DNS.pl +48.225231204NASK 12. Who is, or will be, the permanent Tier 1 registry? NASK Research and Academic Computer Network 18 Wawozowa Str 02-796 Warsaw www.DNS.pl +48.225231204 13. How will the Tier 1 registry selection be made? (i.e. decision, license, concession, agreement, public procurement, etc.) DECISION 14. How will the method of cost recovery for the Tier 1 registry's operations? Annual fee per registered number / year (ca. 2 - 5 EUR) 15. Will there be more than one Tier 1 provider for the country? NO 16. Will there be ENUM registrars? YES, REGISTRAR = TSP 17. What will be the ENUM validation technique? NASK accepts all "create" requests from TSPs without validation. "Update" can be done if the correct "authInfo" is provided by the new TSP. "Transfer" can be done if the correct "authInfo" is provided by the new TSP. Generally: If TSP provides the false data, TSP is subject to prosecution (TSP must comply with Telecommunication Act) 18. Is there/will there be a special number block for ENUM and/or IP Telephony? NO 19. Is there special treatment for unlisted numbers? Only valid E164 numbers assigned by Office of Telecommunications and Post Regulation (URTiP) can be registered. 20. Are there any plans for infrastructure ENUM? a.Infrastructure ENUM is one of the possibilities for Number Portability Administration Center (NASK's project) b. Infrastructure ENUM is platform for cost optimization solutions (NASK + Warsaw University of Technology) 21. What is your ENUM WHOIS address? http://www.dns.pl/cgi-bin/enum_lookup.pl 22. Please provide the history of ENUM trials, projects etc., if any. History: July 18, 2002 delegation, 2002 - 2004: trial May 19, 2004: Registry software ready, protocol defined 23. What are your future plans? (and dates if available) TBD 24. What is your date estimate on a production ENUM registry launch? May 19, 2004 From dolderer at denic.de Wed Sep 29 16:00:55 2004 From: dolderer at denic.de (Sabine Dolderer/Denic) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:00:55 +0200 Subject: [enum-wg] Survey on ENUM Projects In-Reply-To: <413F298A.7050301@centr.org> Message-ID: What is the country and E.164 code? Germany & +49 Who is the delegate for the E.164 code? DENIC eG Wiesenh?ttenplatz 26 60329 Frankfurt Germany The status of deployment (notdelegated>applied>delegated/objected>trial>hiatus>production) trial ENUM Project contact details (telephone, email, web) +49 69 27235 0 enum at denic.de www.denic.de/en/enum Is a trial being, or going to be, conducted? A trial is on the way What type of numbers are being used in the trial? geographical, freephone and mobil numbers. Is there work or plans toward full permanent deployment? That should be the result of the trial. What type of numbers are to be used in full deployment? That should be the result of the trial. Who is leading the ENUM project? (government, industry working group, etc.) Industry. Who operates the ccTLD for that country at present? DENIC eG Wiesenh?ttenplatz 26 60329 Frankfurt Germany What type of organisation runs the ccTLD? (state, private, academic, etc.) private What is the ccTLD legal regulation, if any? None Who is the current Tier 1 registry? DENIC eG Wiesenh?ttenplatz 26 60329 Frankfurt Germany Who is, or will be, the permanent Tier 1 registry? A recommendation can be result of the trial. How will the Tier 1 registry selection be made? (i.e. decision, license, concession, agreement, public procurement, etc.) A recommendation can be result of the trial. How will the method of cost recovery for the Tier 1 registry's operations? A recommendation can be result of the trial. Will there be more than one Tier 1 provider for the country? A recommendation can be result of the trial. Will there be ENUM registrars? Most probably. What will be the ENUM validation technique? A recommendation can be result of the trial. Is there/will there be a special number block for ENUM and/or IP Telephony? There is currently a proposal from the German regulation authority to implement a special numbering block in the future. Is there special treatment for unlisted numbers? No. Are there any plans for infrastructure ENUM? Some. What is your ENUM WHOIS address? We don't have currently ENUM WHOIS Please provide the history of ENUM trials, projects etc., if any. Please see www.denic.de/en/enum What are your future plans? (and dates if available) What is your date estimate on a production ENUM registry launch? Not yet decided Viele Gr??e Sabine Dolderer -- Sabine Dolderer DENIC eG Wiesenh?ttenplatz 26 D-60329 Frankfurt eMail: Sabine.Dolderer at denic.de Fon: +49 69 27235 0 Fax: +49 69 27235 235 Kim Davies Gesendet von: enum-wg-admin at ripe.net An enum-wg at ripe.net 08.09.2004 17:47 Kopie Thema [enum-wg] Survey on ENUM Projects $MessageID: <413F298A.7050301 at centr.org> SendTo: enum-wg at ripe.net Subject: [enum-wg] Survey on ENUM Projects From: enum-wg-admin at ripe.net PostedDate: 08.09.2004 17:47:22 Received: from smtp.denic.de ([81.91.161.3]) by notes.denic.de with ESMTP id 2004090817480334-23208 ; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 17:48:03 +0200 Received: from postboy.ripe.net (postboy.ripe.net [193.0.0.201]) by smtp.denic.de with esmtp id 1C54fz-0000Dp-2Q; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 17:48:03 +0200 Received: from postboy.ripe.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postboy.ripe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303C06DEAF; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 17:48:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by postboy.ripe.net (Postfix, from userid 8) id 920AA71D06; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 17:47:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from postman.ripe.net (postman.ripe.net [193.0.0.199]) by postboy.ripe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8614E6DEAF for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 17:47:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: by postman.ripe.net (Postfix, from userid 8) id 810674E633; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 17:47:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kaiser.centr.org (s15114026.rootmaster.info [217.160.143.182]) by postman.ripe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC954E7B8 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 17:47:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by kaiser.centr.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2154A3FA0C3 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 15:47:30 +0000 (UTC) Delivered_To: enum-wg at lists.ripe.net PRINCIPAL: Kim Davies Organization: Council of European National Top Level Domain Registries User_Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) X_Accept_Language: en-us, en MIME_Version: 1.0 X_RIPE_Spam_Level: ** X_RIPE_Spam_Status: U 0.414415 / 0.0 / 1.5 / disabled X_RIPE_Signature: 042e79c33721cb31ef5466046d4e6d2e Errors_To: enum-wg-admin at ripe.net X_BeenThere: enum-wg at ripe.net X_Mailman_Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List_Id: Mailing list for the ENUM working group list_post: X_RIPE_Lists: Mailing list for the ENUM working group List_Subscribe: , List_Unsubscribe: , list_help: List_Archive: $MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on notes/Denic(Release 6.5.2|June 01, 2004) at 08.09.2004 17:48:03;MIME-CD by Notes Client on Sabine Dolderer/Denic(Release 6.0.2CF1|June 9, 2003) at 09.09.2004 12:06:08;MIME-CD complete at 09.09.2004 12:06:08 SMTPOriginator: enum-wg-admin at ripe.net $TKAttaConversion: DONE 0.000sec $TkFlag50: starting jobs # notes/Denic # 08.09.2004 17:48:03 # Process M05;jobs ended # notes/Denic # 08.09.2004 17:48:04 RouteServers: CN=notes/O=Denic RouteTimes: 08.09.2004 17:48:03-08.09.2004 17:48:05 DeliveredDate: 08.09.2004 17:48:05 $MiniView: $Highlights_Subject: $Highlights_Body: $Highlights_denicReceived: $EncryptionStatus: 0 $SignatureStatus: 0 Dear all, As discussed recently on the list, the chairs have commenced preparing a status page to identify and document the various ENUM projects being conducted in different countries. We would like feedback on the formulation of the questions. At present they are based heavily on those developed by Joakim Str?lmark of the Swedish PTS in a recent survey. If there is additional information that would be useful, or if there is a better formulation for the questions, please provide your input. Most important we would like contributions of information on the various trials being conducted, so we can start populating the table with data. The page is available for the moment at this address: http://www.centr.org/kim/enum/index.html best regards, kim -- Kim Davies, Council of European National Top Level Domain Registries Avenue Louise 327, B-1050 Brussels; Tel. +32 2 627 5550 From enumvoipsip.cs at schiefner.de Thu Sep 30 12:13:37 2004 From: enumvoipsip.cs at schiefner.de (Carsten Schiefner) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:13:37 +0200 Subject: [enum-wg] DENIC's 3rd "ENUM day" held Message-ID: <415BDC51.7070107@schiefner.de> All, DENIC, the registry for 9.4.e164.arpa (Germany/+49), successfully completed its 3rd ENUM day on Tuesday this week - please refer to the press release below. Unfortunately it is availabe in German only so far - I'll post a link to the English translation as soon as it will become available. Regards, Carsten -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [DENICmitglieder] Pressemitteilung: ENUM gewinnt an Fahrt Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:41:12 +0200 From: Klaus Herzig/Denic Reply-To: Klaus Herzig/Denic To: presse at denic.de Pressemitteilung Frankfurt am Main, den 28. September 2004 ENUM gewinnt an Fahrt Dritter ENUM-Tag der DENIC eG mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheit Im Rahmen des laufenden ENUM-Testbetriebs veranstaltete die Registrierungsstelle DENIC am 28. September 2004 den dritten ENUM-Tag. ENUM ist eine neue Technologie, die eine Br?cke zwischen Telekommunikation und Internet schl?gt. ?ber ENUM und die ENUM-Dienste wird den Nutzern anhand der etablierten Rufnummern die gesamte Welt der Kommunikation er?ffnet. 140 Experten, unter ihnen viele DENIC-Mitglieder, die bereits ENUM-Domains anbieten, Telekommunikationsdienstleister und Wissenschaftler, diskutierten ?ber die Fortschritte, die ENUM in Deutschland in den letzten Monaten gemacht hat. Seit dem zweiten ENUM-Tag im M?rz 2004 hat sich die Zahl der Provider, die Registrierungen von ENUM-Domains vornehmen, mehr als verdoppelt. Der Nutzer hat inzwischen die Auswahl unter 43 Anbietern. Noch st?rker gestiegen ist mit 227 Prozent die Zahl der ENUM-Domains von 260 auf 850. Dies erscheint wenig angesichts der gro?en Zahl von Telefonanschl?ssen. Unter jeder ENUM-Domains lassen sich aber ganze Telefonanlagen mit vielen hundert bis tausend Nebenstellen betreiben, so dass die Zahl der Anwender von ENUM deutlich h?her liegt als die Zahl der Domains. Ein wichtiges Thema des ENUM-Tages war das Thema Sicherheit sowie Konzepte, wie das Problem von SPAM im Bereich der Internet-Telephonie (auch SPIT genannt) angegangen werden kann. In beiden F?llen spielen Aspekte der Authentifizierung (also der Frage, ob der angezeigte Absender einer Nachricht auch wirklich derjenige ist) und des Schutzes vor Datenaussp?hung und Datenver?nderung eine Rolle. Hier wurden von den Referenten verschiedene Modelle f?r zuk?nftige L?sungsstrategien vorgestellt. So besch?ftigte sich Professor Dr. Andreas Steffen von der Z?rcher Hochschule Winterthur mit Sicherheitsfragen auf der technischen Protokollebene des ENUM-Standards. John-Erik Horn stellte seine Vorstellungen f?r ein rein internetgebundenes Telefonnetz f?r Deutschland vor, das fl?chendeckend ENUM beim Verbindungsaufbau einsetzt. ENUM wurde jedoch nicht nur aus technischer Sicht betrachtet. Dr. Volker Leib, Sozialwissenschaftler am Nexus-Institut in Berlin, stuft Internet, Voice-over-IP und ENUM als bedeutende Innovationen ein, die zu grundlegenden Struktur?nderungen f?hren werden und zum Teil bereits gef?hrt haben. So werde sich die technische Grundlage der Telefonie in den n?chsten Jahren gewaltig ver?ndern. Gro?e Telekommunikationsunternehmen wie die Deutsche Telekom oder die British Telecom gingen davon aus, dass das bisherige Telefonnetz innerhalb der kommenden f?nf bis zehn Jahre abgeschaltet und durch ein auf der Internet-Technologie basierendes IP-Netz ersetzt wird. Dennoch w?rden die derzeitigen Telefonnummern auch weiterhin in Gebrauch bleiben, ebenso wie die ?ber zwei Milliarden Telefonanschl?sse, die es weltweit gibt. Leib pl?diert daher f?r eine vorausschauende Innovationspolitik, die einen Rahmen f?r die zuk?nftige Entwicklung bereitstellt, der Rechts- und Planungssicherheit f?r die beteiligten Unternehmen gew?hrleistet. Daneben m?sse ein leichter Markzutritt f?r Anbieter von Voice-over-IP-Diensten erm?glicht werden. Es sei immens wichtig, auf einen baldigen Beginn des ENUM-Wirkbetriebs hinzuarbeiten und den ?bergang vom derzeitigen Testbetrieb auf den Wirkbetrieb so unkompliziert wie m?glich zu gestalten, so Leib abschlie?end. Die Pr?sentationen und Vortragsunterlagen sind in K?rze auch unter http://www.denic.de/de/enum/veranstaltungen/denic_enum-tage/index.html zu finden. Hintergrund: ENUM ENUM leitet sich ab von telephone number mapping und steht f?r ein Protokoll, mit dem Ressourcen aus dem Telekommunikations- und dem Internetbereich verkn?pft werden k?nnen. Es definiert eine Vorschrift, mit der eine Telefonnummer in eindeutiger Weise auf eine Domain abgebildet wird. Diese Domain kann dann zur Identifizierung unterschiedlicher Kommunikationsdienste herangezogen werden, zum Beispiel Fax, Mobilfunk, Voice Mail Systeme, E-Mail-Adressen, IP-Telefonie-Adressen, Webseiten, oder Anrufumleitungen. Die Idee, die hinter ENUM steckt, ist so einfach wie bestechend. Statt sich mit einer Vielzahl von Rufnummern und Adressen f?r Privat- und B?rotelefon, Handy, Fax, E-Mail oder Webseite auseinandersetzen zu m?ssen, die nur mit sehr viel Aufwand aktuell zu halten sind, gen?gt es in Zukunft, eine einzige Nummer in sein Adressverzeichnis einzutragen. Die Zuordnung zu den jeweils passenden Ausgabeger?ten ?bernehmen die Eintr?ge im ENUM-Nameserver. Durch die Verkn?pfung von Telefonnummern und Internet-Ressourcen ergeben sich v?llig neue Dienste. Ein Basisdienst ist das Auffinden eines telephonief?higen Internet-Endger?tes von einem herk?mmlichen Telefon aus. Optional liefert ENUM aber auch Hinweise auf zus?tzliche Kommunikationsm?glichkeiten. Sollte ein telephonief?higes Internet-Endger?t nicht erreichbar sein, kann aus der Liste weiterer Anwendungen eine entsprechende Alternative ausgew?hlt werden. Weitere Information zu ENUM und zum Testbetrieb bei der DENIC erh?lt man auf der DENIC-Webseite http://www.denic.de/de/enum/index.html. DENIC> Dr. Klaus Herzig DENIC> Pressestelle DENIC> DENIC eG DENIC> Wiesenh?ttenplatz 26 DENIC> 60329 Frankfurt am Main, Germany DENIC> Tel. +49 69 27235-274, Fax. +49 69 27235-235 DENIC> E-Mail: presse at DENIC.de DENIC> http://www.denic.de