Re: First user ENUM deployment from Romania (+40)

["Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP)" <]

Hi James, folks,
  ...or it might be a corporate registration. We have a 1000 number 
block in the
UK ENUM system, with all but one of the numbers with an associated ENUM 
zone.
(hey - I want to test what happens when clients expect to find a zone 
but don't :).

I raise the question simply 'cos it seems to me that corporates are 
where the
money is, and so they're much more likely to make a "user" ENUM 
registration.
There been discussions in the UK (and in the US, IIRC) over whether or 
not these
corporate registrations should be individually delegated from the Tier 
1 or
delegated out in a block that is then broken down by the corporate 
Registrant
(or their agents).

Romania joins the ranks of the clueful with an ->Official<- delegation 
and real
registrations, "tied in" to the global ENUM hierarchy and accessible 
anywhere.

I wonder when those ranks will include other larger countries or 
regions :).

all the best,
  Lawrence

On 6 Jul 2004, at 23:48, James Seng wrote:
> this likes more like an enum delegation to an operator then user enum 
> as we know it. but hey, thats one great step forward :-)
>
> james
>
> Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP) wrote:
> > Hi again Adrian, folks,
> >   Aha! The extra information helps :)
> > So this "User" ENUM deployment uses a block delegation, with a 10K 
> > number block.
> > Thus the lookup on "+403170" should be a lookup on "+4031710xxxx"
> > Is block delegation the standard choice in .ro?
> > all the best,
> >   Lawrence