<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: ENUM domain names in Poland.

>>>>> "paf" == =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Patrik F=E4ltstr=F6m?= <ISO-8859-1> writes:

    >> ps: it does make sense to put both 2916 and 2916bis in the
    >> record.  perhaps someone should put together a BCP.

    paf> No, this is just a transition issue which I hope is gone
    paf> pretty quickly. I would guess the 2916 records are not needed
    paf> one year after 2916bis is _really_ published as an RFC.

So 2916 will go away in 2030 or theresabouts? :-)

<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>