Re: ENUM test registrar operational
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 11:54:16 +0100
On torsdag, feb 27, 2003, at 10:43 Europe/Stockholm, Stastny Richard
Yes I did object to e164.com until netnumber clearly stated what it was
to be used for, and why.
Finally we may set up in .at what we want, this is a national issue
(BTW, did you complain about e164.com from netnumber?).
The same way I have already seen people being confused about this
domain of yours (including people in the Swedish Government) claiming
this initiative and announcement came from RIPE NCC (i.e. to a certain
degree approved by someone, TSB/ITU-T/IAB/IETF etc).
Domains for "testing" is something people have been doing in many
domains (including the one netnumber use of course) so why one more?
Why announce it on this list which is about ENUM trials, and
unfortunately the wording in the announcement obviously was confusing
You here/now stated clearly your view and why you did this. I hope that
helps the current situation.