From eimann at etherkiller.de Tue Jun 7 10:12:11 2011 From: eimann at etherkiller.de (Dominik Bay) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:12:11 +0200 Subject: [eix-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] v6day.ripe.net In-Reply-To: <39F6A6F7-4710-4541-9281-959EFBB893E0@marcoh.net> References: <4DEDCCF0.7060106@ripe.net> <39F6A6F7-4710-4541-9281-959EFBB893E0@marcoh.net> Message-ID: On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:08, Marco Hogewoning wrote: > Looks like somebody is doing test runs across ams-ix or did some private peering flap ? Anybody in the EIX community that sees the same or who can shed some light on this ? According to a source on IRC it was a measurement error (confirmed by an AMS-IX statement). -dominik From marcoh at marcoh.net Tue Jun 7 10:08:34 2011 From: marcoh at marcoh.net (Marco Hogewoning) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 12:08:34 +0400 Subject: [eix-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] v6day.ripe.net In-Reply-To: <4DEDCCF0.7060106@ripe.net> References: <4DEDCCF0.7060106@ripe.net> Message-ID: <39F6A6F7-4710-4541-9281-959EFBB893E0@marcoh.net> On Jun 7, 2011, at 11:02 AM, Robert Kisteleki wrote: > Our dashboard for world IPv6 day is now officially open at > > http://v6day.ripe.net/ > > It leads to loads of statistical and diagnostic information. > We are still tweaking it a little and adding things. > > Enjoy > > Robert Looks like somebody is doing test runs across ams-ix or did some private peering flap ? Anybody in the EIX community that sees the same or who can shed some light on this ? Marco (just a curious citizen) From arien.vijn at ams-ix.net Tue Jun 7 10:13:30 2011 From: arien.vijn at ams-ix.net (Arien Vijn) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:13:30 +0200 Subject: [eix-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] v6day.ripe.net In-Reply-To: <39F6A6F7-4710-4541-9281-959EFBB893E0@marcoh.net> References: <4DEDCCF0.7060106@ripe.net> <39F6A6F7-4710-4541-9281-959EFBB893E0@marcoh.net> Message-ID: <4E79F36B-9C8B-4AAD-A5A4-76259DE66B65@ams-ix.net> On 7 Jun 2011 (24), at 10:08 AM, Marco Hogewoning wrote: > Looks like somebody is doing test runs across ams-ix or did some private peering flap ? Anybody in the EIX community that sees the same or who can shed some light on this ? It was test traffic and should not have been counted. We are working to subtract it from the real traffic. -- Arien -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 1305 bytes Desc: not available URL: