From pk at DENIC.DE Tue Apr 14 14:38:47 2009 From: pk at DENIC.DE (Peter Koch) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:38:47 +0200 Subject: [dnssec-key-tf] Evaluation of IANA-ITAR against TF requirements Message-ID: <20090414123847.GF28795@x27.adm.denic.de> Dear members of the (former) RIPE task force on a DNSSEC TAR, the result of this TF's work was published basically in this email message subsequently sent to the IANA. Most of you will have seen the IANA announcement of the Interim TAR (ITAR) in beta stage earlier this year, including an email sent by Kim Davies to the DNS WG's mailing list. Not counting the IDN test TLDs, the ITAR contains keys (well, KSK fingerprints) of six TLDs, three of which ccTLDs from within the RIPE region. The ITAR will have been in operation for 10 weeks by RIPE58. In preparation of that meeting, we thought it might be a good to respond to Kim's message by evaluating the ITAR against this TF's recommendations and the valuable additional hindsight. Therefore, I'd like to suggest we gather on Mon or Tue during the meeting week (60-90 minutes should suffice) to draft some feedback. Please indicate whether you'd be interested in this effort. We might end up inviting some more people and do a doodle. Thanks, Peter From jim at rfc1035.com Wed Apr 15 00:19:50 2009 From: jim at rfc1035.com (Jim Reid) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:19:50 +0100 Subject: [dnssec-key-tf] Re: Evaluation of IANA-ITAR against TF requirements In-Reply-To: <20090414123847.GF28795@x27.adm.denic.de> References: <20090414123847.GF28795@x27.adm.denic.de> Message-ID: <676EE72A-FF26-48AB-843B-47B1304B2F91@rfc1035.com> On 14 Apr 2009, at 13:38, Peter Koch wrote: > Therefore, I'd like to suggest we gather on Mon or Tue during the > meeting > week (60-90 minutes should suffice) to draft some feedback. Please > indicate whether you'd be interested in this effort. Count me in! From pk at DENIC.DE Wed Apr 29 12:56:13 2009 From: pk at DENIC.DE (Peter Koch) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:56:13 +0200 Subject: [dnssec-key-tf] Re: Evaluation of IANA-ITAR against TF requirements In-Reply-To: <676EE72A-FF26-48AB-843B-47B1304B2F91@rfc1035.com> References: <20090414123847.GF28795@x27.adm.denic.de> <676EE72A-FF26-48AB-843B-47B1304B2F91@rfc1035.com> Message-ID: <20090429105613.GG55634@unknown.office.denic.de> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:19:50PM +0100, Jim Reid wrote: > >Therefore, I'd like to suggest we gather on Mon or Tue during the > >meeting > >week (60-90 minutes should suffice) to draft some feedback. Please > >indicate whether you'd be interested in this effort. > > Count me in! this was the only feedback so far, so let's try a doodle: -Peter