[dns-wg] Lower TTLs for NS and DS records in reverse DNS delegations
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Lower TTLs for NS and DS records in reverse DNS delegations
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Lower TTLs for NS and DS records in reverse DNSdelegations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Thu Dec 2 23:25:05 CET 2021
Hi Petr, > I think lowering both TTLs is a step in right direction, but let me ask provocative question: > > Why not make the TTL _dynamic_, based on time of last change in the RIPE database? Because explicit is better than implicit. Magically calculated dynamic values rarely match operational expectations :) Cheers, Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Lower TTLs for NS and DS records in reverse DNS delegations
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Lower TTLs for NS and DS records in reverse DNSdelegations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]