RIPE Database (Whois)
Website

By searching you explicitly express your agreement with the RIPE Database terms and conditions

You are here: Home > Participate > Join a Discussion > RIPE Mailing Lists > The dns-wg Archives

[dns-wg] Lower TTLs for NS and DS records in reverse DNS delegations

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Lower TTLs for NS and DS records in reverse DNS delegations
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Lower TTLs for NS and DS records in reverse DNSdelegations

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Sander Steffann sander at steffann.nl
Thu Dec 2 23:25:05 CET 2021

Hi Petr,

> I think lowering both TTLs is a step in right direction, but let me ask provocative question:
> 
> Why not make the TTL _dynamic_, based on time of last change in the RIPE database?

Because explicit is better than implicit. Magically calculated dynamic values rarely match operational expectations :)

Cheers,
Sander

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Lower TTLs for NS and DS records in reverse DNS delegations
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Lower TTLs for NS and DS records in reverse DNSdelegations

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]