[dns-wg] Lower TTLs for NS and DS records in reverse DNS delegations
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Lower TTLs for NS and DS records in reverse DNS delegations
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Lower TTLs for NS and DS records in reverse DNS delegations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael Richardson
mcr+ietf at sandelman.ca
Thu Dec 2 18:08:13 CET 2021
Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf at gmail.com> wrote: > I support lowering the TTL on the DS records to 3600. > I support lowering the TTL on the NS records - I was going to put my > hat in for 21600, but Mr van Dijk's suggestion of 3600 is very > enticing. > But I liked Mr. Lawrence's suggestion on gathering data on lowering the > NS records TTL. Perhaps the TTL can be lowered from 172800 to 86400 to > 21600, then to 3600, collecting data along the way. Aside from performance/load on the distributing name servers, what else would you collect? Or perhaps I am asking: What is your hypothesis, and what kind of data do you need to prove/disprove it? -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF at sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 487 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/dns-wg/attachments/20211202/eecf431a/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Lower TTLs for NS and DS records in reverse DNS delegations
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Lower TTLs for NS and DS records in reverse DNS delegations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]