This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[dns-wg] Lower TTLs for NS and DS records in reverse DNS delegations

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Lower TTLs for NS and DS records in reverse DNS delegations
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Lower TTLs for NS and DS records in reverse DNS delegations

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Michiel Klaver michiel at klaver.it
Thu Dec 2 15:34:25 CET 2021

> - Quick turnaround around changes and potential problems. Most
> problems happen right after change, in which case even 1 hour is PITA.

One hour should then be your upper (stable) limit. From experience I know DNS problems can occur anytime anywhere unplanned, not just after a change in the RIPE DB.

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Lower TTLs for NS and DS records in reverse DNS delegations
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Lower TTLs for NS and DS records in reverse DNS delegations

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]