This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working group chair
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working group chair
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working group chair
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Fri Oct 16 01:13:23 CEST 2020
> On 16 Oct 2020, at 00:00, Dave Knight <dave at shl.io> wrote: > >> Maybe have the outgoing and existing chairs explicitly go out and >> encourage someone who hasn't served before to volunteer? > > I struggle to reconcile our efforts toward impartiality with the notion of having the chairs encouraging a preferred candidate. It depends on what’s meant by encouragement. I'm fairly sure Paul means approaching someone (or more than one) and saying “Have you ever thought of becoming a WG co-chair?”. Which would be fine. He almost certainly wasn’t meaning the co-chairs dictate to the WG who they must select. Which obviously would not be fine. Encouraging someone to stand doesn’t necessarily mean there’s a preferred candidate (after all the WG makes the selection) or impartiality has been compromised.
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working group chair
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working group chair
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]