[dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Thu Jun 13 10:41:43 CEST 2019
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 09:40:20AM +0100, Jim Reid wrote: > > On 12 Jun 2019, at 21:06, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote: > > > > we don't really need this because it's not fixing a problem. > > Indeed. There???s no problem here that needs fixing. > > > ... the RIPE NCC's record for handling dns delegation over the years shows that they're doing a good job and unless this changes, the best thing to do would be to let them continue doing their job as they see fit. > > +1. > > The current mechanism is working just fine. It isn???t broken. +1 Piotr -- Piotr Strzyżewski Silesian University of Technology, Computer Centre Gliwice, Poland
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]