[dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rubens Kuhl
rubensk at nic.br
Tue Jun 11 19:26:59 CEST 2019
> Em 11 de jun de 2019, à(s) 13:58:000, Jonas Frey <jf at probe-networks.de> escreveu: > > >>> Run a open resolver and secure it propely >> These two things are mutually exclusive. Sorry. >> > > Well, then all of these (running open resolvers) must be wrong: > - Google > - Cloudflare > - Quad9 > - OpenDNS > - Yandex > - Comodo > - Norton > - Clean Browsing > - ... > > > Anyway, isnt this the wrong discussion? The topic is wether RIPE should > block, warn or pass these resolvers. > > None of those organisations run authoritative servers on the same open recursive servers, either for direct or reverse domains. Rubens
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]