[dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jonas Frey
jf at probe-networks.de
Tue Jun 11 18:58:06 CEST 2019
> > Run a open resolver and secure it propely > These two things are mutually exclusive. Sorry. > Well, then all of these (running open resolvers) must be wrong: - Google - Cloudflare - Quad9 - OpenDNS - Yandex - Comodo - Norton - Clean Browsing - ... Anyway, isnt this the wrong discussion? The topic is wether RIPE should block, warn or pass these resolvers. - Jonas -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/dns-wg/attachments/20190611/908f574f/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]