[dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Using CDS delegation to add DS records (was Re: NCC reverse delegation criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Anand Buddhdev
anandb at ripe.net
Tue Jun 11 10:52:00 CEST 2019
Good morning Måns, We will come back to you shortly with answers to your and others' questions in this thread. Regards, Anand Buddhdev RIPE NCC On 10/06/2019 09:22, Måns Nilsson wrote: > Recently, a discussion regarding the checks performed by the NCC before > reverse delegation is made came up on the members-discuss list. It was > concluded that this should be discussed here rather than there. > > The members archive might not be available to all, so I'll try to > summarize. Please add your take on summary if you find mine lacking. > > The questioned practice was that the NCC rejects the delegation request > if the target server is found to be an open recursor. > > Some participants argued that this is not a technical problem, and some > said yes it is. > > Some held that the NCC has no authority blocking a request, but it was > argued that every delegation is subject to RFC 1591 responsibilites. > > For starters, are the delegation requirements described somewhere? > > Best regards, >
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Using CDS delegation to add DS records (was Re: NCC reverse delegation criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]