[dns-wg] Using CDS delegation to add DS records (was Re: NCC reverse delegation criteria)
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Using CDS delegation to add DS records (was Re: NCC reverse delegation criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Using CDS delegation to add DS records (was Re: NCC reverse delegation criteria)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Erwin Lansing
erwin at dk-hostmaster.dk
Tue Jun 11 09:00:39 CEST 2019
> On 10 Jun 2019, at 18.04, Shane Kerr <shane at time-travellers.org> wrote: > > > > Of course, if the goal was ADDING of DS records, then I admit that the system is not there. I can see the benefit of being able to add DS records to the parent via CDS/CDNSKEY, especially for operators trying to secure (for example) reverse DNS for lots of /24's. > > Is this important to you (or anyone else)? > I’ll raise my hand here. We hold a legacy PI /24, which means the parent, in the DNS sense, is run by a 3rd party, not us nor RIPE. Of course that 3rd party does not support DNSSEC, at least last time I asked. Med venlig hilsen / Best regards Erwin Lansing Head of Security & Chief Technologist
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Using CDS delegation to add DS records (was Re: NCC reverse delegation criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Using CDS delegation to add DS records (was Re: NCC reverse delegation criteria)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]