[dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria

First question is (and RIPE should have the data) how many delegations do
they reject because
the server is an open recursor ? In today's world, I suspect it would be
quite low

Tim

On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 3:23 AM Måns Nilsson <mansaxel at besserwisser.org>
wrote:

> Recently, a discussion regarding the checks performed by the NCC before
> reverse delegation is made came up on the members-discuss list.  It was
> concluded that this should be discussed here rather than there.
>
> The members archive might not be available to all, so I'll try to
> summarize. Please add your take on summary if you find mine lacking.
>
> The questioned practice was that the NCC rejects the delegation request
> if the target server is found to be an open recursor.
>
> Some participants argued that this is not a technical problem, and some
> said yes it is.
>
> Some held that the NCC has no authority blocking a request, but it was
> argued that every delegation is subject to RFC 1591 responsibilites.
>
> For starters, are the delegation requirements described somewhere?
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Måns Nilsson     primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
> MN-1334-RIPE           SA0XLR            +46 705 989668
> In 1962, you could buy a pair of SHARKSKIN SLACKS, with a "Continental
> Belt," for $10.99!!
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/dns-wg/attachments/20190610/827ec3e7/attachment.html>