[dns-wg] Tweaks to RIPE 663: Secondary DNS Service for ccTLD Operators
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNS Privacy
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Tweaks to RIPE 663: Secondary DNS Service for ccTLD Operators
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shane Kerr
shane at time-travellers.org
Thu May 26 14:33:58 CEST 2016
Hello, Anand just mentioned at his presentation at RIPE 72 that the RIPE NCC is now implementing RIPE 663: https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-663 There were a couple of suggestions for tweaks to that: 1. Gaurab and I think that there should be an exemption for ccTLD who do not currently have IPv6 service. (There are a few tens of ccTLD who do not yet have IPV6, and I would like the RIPE NCC to be able to help them get IPv6 service if they want it.) 2. Gaurab mentioned that there are some ccTLD who have 3 servers but they are all in the same network. The document should be flexible in order to insure network diversity. I know the document is less than 6 months old and just being implemented now, but maybe we can revise it to include these two changes? I'm happy to do a quick pass at text for this if that makes sense. Cheers, -- Shane -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/dns-wg/attachments/20160526/0c01003e/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNS Privacy
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Tweaks to RIPE 663: Secondary DNS Service for ccTLD Operators
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]