[dns-wg] DNS Privacy
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNS Privacy
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNS Privacy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sara Dickinson
sara at sinodun.com
Thu May 26 07:58:11 CEST 2016
> On 25 May 2016, at 19:13, Roland van Rijswijk - Deij <Roland.vanRijswijk at surfnet.nl> wrote: Hi Roland, > I've already run a number of benchmark tests with TLS-enabled Unbound, That’s interesting, we are doing the same although there still are a couple of features that are missing from Unbound for it to be fully performant/production ready. We have also had a lot of discussions about how existing load balancers might be modified do to the TCP/TLS connection management for DNS, so it would actually be interesting to have resolvers with differing configurations. > and would be willing to host one or two public resolvers at SURFnet that > are TLS-enabled. Would that be helpful? That sounds great. > I even have (relatively) nice IP > addresses available ;-) (145.0.0.145 comes to mind). nice :-) Sara. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 495 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/dns-wg/attachments/20160526/3fd3370f/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNS Privacy
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNS Privacy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]