[dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Securing Network Infrastructure for DNS Servers
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Securing Network Infrastructure for DNS Servers
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Securing Network Infrastructure for DNS Servers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos M. Martinez
carlosm3011 at gmail.com
Tue Jun 28 16:01:17 CEST 2016
It talks about rate limiting, which seems to me is a bit hard to do in a stateless way :-D > On Jun 28, 2016, at 10:59 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:46:17AM -0300, > Carlos M. Martinez <carlosm3011 at gmail.com> wrote > a message of 31 lines which said: > >> I’m sure there are plenty of people that will disagree with me, but, >> IMO, you should never put stateful devices in front of a DNS >> server. > > I fully agree but, precisely, this article use stateless filtering. >
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Securing Network Infrastructure for DNS Servers
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Securing Network Infrastructure for DNS Servers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]