[dns-wg] Request for trusted party to provide secondary DNS services for the RIPE NCC’s zones
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Request for trusted party to provide secondary DNS services for the RIPE NCC’s zones
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Plan documents for root KSK roll project now available
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Romeo Zwart
romeo.zwart at ripe.net
Tue Jul 26 10:43:43 CEST 2016
Hi Jim, On 16/07/25 18:49 , Jim Reid wrote: > >> On 25 Jul 2016, at 16:56, Romeo Zwart <romeo.zwart at ripe.net> wrote: [..] >> We have tried to make these requirements as clear as possible, including >> distinctions between mandatory and optional elements, and we have >> documented those in the document that will be sent on request. > > Great! It’s a pity this isn’t mentioned in the announcement. > >> It would indeed be unrealistic to expect detailed responses based on the >> limited information that is on the mentioned web page. That is clearly >> not our expectation. > > I’m glad to hear that Romeo. Though until your recent clarification email, I fear you may well have given prospective bidders that impression. Thanks for those comments! We will add some clarifying text to the web page. Cheers, Romeo
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Request for trusted party to provide secondary DNS services for the RIPE NCC’s zones
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Plan documents for root KSK roll project now available
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]