[dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Researching F-root Anycast Placement Using RIPE Atlas
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Researching F-root Anycast Placement Using RIPE Atlas
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Researching F-root Anycast Placement Using RIPE Atlas
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shane Kerr
shane at time-travellers.org
Wed Oct 14 16:28:04 CEST 2015
Randy, On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 15:20:57 +0200 Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote: > from a discussion in montréal > > q: why do we anycast dns? > a: for attack resistance, latency is a secondary effect > > q: what are the majority of queries? > a: trash > > q: where should we place instances? > a: near folk who need queries answered. bzzzt! no! > a: near the sources of the rubbish so it can be absorbed quickly Interesting point. This suggests a better (new?) metric is needed. I'm not exactly sure what this would be though. :) Cheers, -- Shane
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Researching F-root Anycast Placement Using RIPE Atlas
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Researching F-root Anycast Placement Using RIPE Atlas
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]