[dns-wg] RIPE NCC secondary name services for ccTLDs

On 11/12/2015 09:41 AM, Romeo Zwart wrote:

> The RIPE NCC offers a best-effort secondary name service for ccTLDs 
> in the start-up phase of their organisational life.
> 
> At RIPE 68 you, the working group, provided us with some guidelines 
> regarding the eligibility of new zones to be added to this service. 
> We intend to document these guidelines in the form of a new RIPE 
> Document*, of which a draft version is attached to this email.
> 
> We welcome any comments you may have on this document.

Under "4. Eligibility Criteria" the 2nd and 3rd points say
"there is no need for the RIPE NCC's secondary service for this zone",
but the first point says "no longer in the start-up phase". It's unclear
what the difference is, if there is a material difference than perhaps
that could be clarified, or if none, maybe the language should be made
common to all 3 clauses ?

Keith