This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[dns-wg] a final(?) co-chair selection process

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] a final(?) co-chair selection process
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] a final(?) co-chair selection process

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Nick Hilliard nick at foobar.org
Tue May 5 17:26:00 CEST 2015

On 05/05/2015 14:28, Jim Reid wrote:
> Colleagues, here is what I hope could be a co-chair selection process
> that the WG can adopt. It's been tweaked to take account of recent
> feedback and should now be free of ambiguities.

in the case where two chairs are due to resign in the same year, the
process for deciding who stands down is still ambiguous.  When this was
discussed in January, there was some consensus that this should be
clarified.  A couple of suggestions were made about how to deal with this.

Nick

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] a final(?) co-chair selection process
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] a final(?) co-chair selection process

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]