[dns-wg] RIPE NCC domain registrations
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC domain registrations
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC domain registrations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joe Abley
jabley at hopcount.ca
Tue Jun 30 15:18:34 CEST 2015
On 30 Jun 2015, at 8:50, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote: > Looking over that list .. > > The .int - only a very small set of organisations could register one, > so there’s absolutely no reason to keep it if it’s not being used. The only counter reasoning I can think of is that if there's a chance it might be useful to use it in the future, it's probably less effort to keep it than to go through the paperwork again. INT domains are not three-click purchases; they're handled through (currently) manual processing at the IANA. (Maybe there's some measurement of the performance of delegations through the INT servers that would be easier to handle with control over a child zone than without? Seems plausible, but a bit of a stretch.) > The hyphenated domains - is there any “risk” in dropping them? I > sincerely doubt it > > As for the rest - I’ve no strong feelings either way, but holding on > to a bunch of domains “just because” is pointless I agree. > And I wasn’t even aware that RIPE would even need to consult with > the community or members on this kind of administrative matter . . Me neither, but I certainly feel warm and fuzzy inside now that I have been consulted. Could be something I ate, though. Joe
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC domain registrations
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC domain registrations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]