[dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jaap Akkerhuis
jaap at NLnetLabs.nl
Tue Nov 18 18:44:41 CET 2014
Wilfried Woeber writes: > Nick Hilliard wrote: > > > On 18/11/2014 11:16, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > >> Let's have RIPE.INT > removed. > > > tbh, I see no reason to remove ripe.int. [...] > > Please leave it alone. > > In order to achieve or conserve - what? > Energy. jaap PS. The last time I looked, all contracts with (g)TLD registries has various names reserved, among them, RIPE. So, default RIPE.$TLD is reserved. I guess that is to stop delegations like ripe.org.
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]