[dns-wg] Global Vs local node data in www.root-servers.org
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Global Vs local node data in www.root-servers.org
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Relative response time graph
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Mon Mar 17 16:51:03 CET 2014
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:11:40AM -0400, Joe Abley wrote: > > On 17 Mar 2014, at 10:27, manning bill <bmanning at isi.edu> wrote: > > > alas, our service predates Joe’s marvelous text. > > > > “B” provides its services locally to its upstream ISPs. > > We don’t play routing tricks, impose routing policy, or attempt to > > influence prefix announcement. > > In the taxonomy I just shared, that makes the origin nodes of B all "global nodes". > > To clarify though, I certainly wasn't trying to suggest that the things I described were new or original when I was writing in 2003. Anycast had already been in use for quite some time by a variety of people at that time. > > It's specifically the terms "local" and "global" in a DNS anycast context that I was apologising for :-) > > > Joe No apology needed. I was clarifying why "B" is listed as a local node. That it doesn't fit you taxonomy is fine - but it does need an explaination. /bill
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Global Vs local node data in www.root-servers.org
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Relative response time graph
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]