[dns-wg] Draft recommendation for limiting the EDNS0 response size on authoritative name servers
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Draft recommendation for limiting the EDNS0 response size on authoritative name servers
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Draft recommendation for limiting the EDNS0 response size on authoritative name servers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gijs van den Broek
broek at surfnet.nl
Fri Sep 21 15:08:42 CEST 2012
Hi Florian, > What's your stance on atomic fragments for IPv6? We did not particularly consider atomic fragments. Could you be a bit more specific? Kind regards, Gijs
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Draft recommendation for limiting the EDNS0 response size on authoritative name servers
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Draft recommendation for limiting the EDNS0 response size on authoritative name servers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]