[dns-wg] DNSOK queries to k-root
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNSOK queries to k-root
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] FWD from "policy-announce": Cosmetic Surgery Project: Extended Review Period on New Draft, Document for Reverse Address Delegation of IPv4 and IPv6 Address Space]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roland van Rijswijk
Roland.vanRijswijk at surfnet.nl
Fri Apr 20 13:37:42 CEST 2012
Hi Romeo/Olaf, On 20 apr. 2012, at 09:57, Romeo Zwart wrote: >> Thanks Daniel, >> >> But my question was not statistics about the OK bit (that measures >> DNSSEC able servers in the field) but about queries for the DNSKEY >> RRset, since the amount of those queries correlates with the amount >> of DNSSEC validation that is actually happening. >> >> The RIPE NCC staff has been so kind to generate such graph on >> request, but it would be very nice to have that data available >> life. Even though the graphs do not demonstrate a significant >> growth at the moment. > > We can certainly investigate the possibility of providing this > information on a regular basis. I assume that, given the current > change rate, daily updates would suffice, or are you really looking at > life as in real time? We've created similar statistics in the past and saw low but promising numbers for our own signed domains; obviously statistics for the root zone would be more significant in this respect. I'm not familiar enough with your setup to judge what would be a reasonable frequency but daily updates sounds good to me. Cheers, Roland -- Roland M. van Rijswijk -- SURFnet Middleware Services -- t: +31-30-2305388 -- e: roland.vanrijswijk at surfnet.nl
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNSOK queries to k-root
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] FWD from "policy-announce": Cosmetic Surgery Project: Extended Review Period on New Draft, Document for Reverse Address Delegation of IPv4 and IPv6 Address Space]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]