This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] Response size of JP's DNSKEY was changed
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Analysis of Increased Query Load on Root Name Servers
 - Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Response size of JP's DNSKEY was changed
 
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Masato Minda
minmin at jprs.co.jp
Wed Jul 13 10:30:23 CEST 2011
Folks
In RIPE 62, I had a presentation about response size of DNS with DNSSEC.
Somebody was interested about reply size of JP's DNSKEY.
(slide 9)
In this slide, the response size of JP's DNSKEY was 1203 octets. Last
week(July 7), we have changed it.
  $ dig +dnssec jp dnskey | grep SIZE
  ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 893
Here is the size of packet.
    -----------------------
    KSK of DNSKEY	276
    ZSK of DNSKEY	148
    RRSIG by KSK	290
    RRSIG by ZSK	162
    -----------------------
    ----------------------
    DNS Header		12
    Question section	 8	JP:4 class:2 type:2
    EDNS0		11
    ----------------------
Before July 7, response of DNSKEY had 1 KSK, 3 ZSK, 1 RRSIG by KSK, and
1 RRSIG by ZSK.
  12 + 8 + 11 + 276*1 + 148*3 + 290*1 + 162*1 = 1203
After July 7, response of DNSKEY has 1 KSK, 2 ZSK and 1 RRSIG by KSK.
  12 + 8 + 11 + 276*1 + 148*2 + 290*1 + 162*0 = 893
It is current result.
* KSK rollover
In KSK rollover, we will use the double signature key rollover.
   12 + 8 + 11 + 276*2 + 148*2 + 290*2 + 162*0 = 1459
Of course, IP and UDP header are needed in real packet,
   		IPv4	  IPv6
	IP	20	  40
	UDP	 8	   8
        --------------------
	total   28        48
The size of packet in KSK rollover, IPv4 is 1487, IPv6 is 1507.
1507 is bigger than traditional MTU. :-(
If the ZSK is only one when KSK rollover, its response size is 1311.
   12 + 8 + 11 + 276*2 + 148*1 + 290*2 + 162*0 = 1311
In this condition, IPv4 is 1339, IPv6 is 1359. It's ok. :-)
It is a bit trouble. But, we will do our best.
Unfortunately it is impossible to less than 1280 in current condition.
I think that ECC (Elliptic Curve Cryptography) can clear under 1280.
Regards,
--
minmin / Masato Minda <minmin at jprs.co.jp>
Research and Development Dept.
Japan Registry Services Co., Ltd. (JPRS)
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Analysis of Increased Query Load on Root Name Servers
 - Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Response size of JP's DNSKEY was changed
 
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]