From wnagele at ripe.net Tue Feb 15 17:30:03 2011 From: wnagele at ripe.net (Wolfgang Nagele) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:30:03 +0100 Subject: [dns-wg] DNSSEC outage in e164.arpa Message-ID: <4D5AAA0B.1040805@ripe.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear colleagues, Our DNSSEC signer system produced a e164.arpa zone that was missing a signature for the current KSK at approximately 13:00 UTC today. We resolved the error at approximately 16:30 UTC by producing a new zone (serial 1297787668). We apologise for the outage and will provide more details after we've analysed the incident. Regards, Wolfgang Nagele RIPE NCC DNS Group Manager -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1aqgsACgkQjO7G63Byy8eDywCfXmTfeQ41MMD3hem0tPHpVJes rWIAn2TTbf/hMOkgooW+7sjTdjVTYFee =wuWz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From jim at rfc1035.com Mon Feb 28 12:50:39 2011 From: jim at rfc1035.com (Jim Reid) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 11:50:39 +0000 Subject: [dns-wg] Request for Comments on IANA Message-ID: Colleagues, NTIA has just issued an RFC on IANA's operation and governance. [No, not an IETF one!] Comments have to be in by the end of March. Response to this RFC will help NTIA to decide about what happens when its current IANA contract ends in September. Here's the URL: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/frnotices/2011/fr_ianafunctionsnoi_02252011.pdf It's not clear to me if this is something the WG collectively could or should respond to. That's up you all of you to decide. However some of you may want to submit your own responses to NTIA.